MensTennisForums.com - View Single Post - 33 combined slams vs 1 - does Murray have the right to be in a "big four"?

View Single Post

Old 01-16-2013, 03:29 PM   #37
country flag shiaben
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,823
shiaben has a reputation beyond reputeshiaben has a reputation beyond reputeshiaben has a reputation beyond reputeshiaben has a reputation beyond reputeshiaben has a reputation beyond reputeshiaben has a reputation beyond reputeshiaben has a reputation beyond reputeshiaben has a reputation beyond reputeshiaben has a reputation beyond reputeshiaben has a reputation beyond reputeshiaben has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 33 combined slams vs 1 - does Murray have the right to be in a "big four"?

If this is about legacy, yep, these 3 are on a different level. But if it is about current performance, I guess it would be a top 4 given Murray grabbed a slam, defeated Federer in a 5 setter (outside of a slam), gets more wins against the top 3 than the other players.

But when entering tournaments, he still won't be a favorite as long as the serves are inconsistent and if his forehand sleeps during big matches.
shiaben is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote