MensTennisForums.com - View Single Post - TT Changes 2013

Thread: TT Changes 2013
View Single Post

Old 12-02-2012, 05:41 AM   #61
country flag buji
Registered User
 
buji's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Age: 25
Posts: 1,978
buji has a reputation beyond reputebuji has a reputation beyond reputebuji has a reputation beyond reputebuji has a reputation beyond reputebuji has a reputation beyond reputebuji has a reputation beyond reputebuji has a reputation beyond reputebuji has a reputation beyond reputebuji has a reputation beyond reputebuji has a reputation beyond reputebuji has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: TT Changes 2013

COMMITMENTS

1) Should players be allowed to play in two places at the same time (the final of a week X event AND the qualifying of a week x+1 event)?
YES

2) Should players who lose in a Grand Slam qualifying be allowed to play a challenger in the following week?[/font] YES

3) GS/IW/Miami week 2 events:[/font]
GS R16 - out of qualifying; GS QF - out of MD? (current rule)
Players should be able to commit to the 2nd week challengers only after they're out of the GSs/IW/Miami

4) Late entries & SE's:

No restrictions? (current rule)
Players who commit as late entries shouldn't be eligible to receive a SE

5) Doubles commitments:

Both players in a partnership should commit/confirm before being accepted in the doubles list

6) Singles commitments by another person?
NO


DRAWS[/font]

7) Late entries & seedings

No restrictions? (current rule)
Late entries shouldn't be seeded

8) Should there be a restriction to avoid singles R1 matches between doubles partners?
NO


SENDING PICKS[/font]

9) Should picks which were sent to the person who posted the OOP be accepted?

NO

10) Should picks sent by e-mail be accepted?
YES ONLY IF THE BOARD IS DOWN!

11) Should there be a punishment for players who don't send picks?

NO!


OOP[/font]

12) Standard minimum of TT matches in first rounds (4, 5, 6, 7, no restrictions?)
It should at least be more than 6.

13) Standardizing the OOP:[/font]
No - Manager's choice


TB System[/font]

14) TB method: The number of sets given to the winner when the player picks the loser (2-1, 3-2 & 3-1 losing picks) should be a tie-breaker before the SR shootout.

YES

15) SR Shootout: Picking the correct winner or SR of a lower SR should have priority over giving a set to the winner when both players pick the loser in a higher SR?
NO

16) PTS:[/font]
Correct order of sets should always beat correct scorelines


RANKING POINTS


17) Qualifying points: There should be points for qualifying wins.

BIG YESSS

18) There should be a Team Race for the World Tour Finals.

YES


OTHERS


19) Retirements should count for SR and shootout purposes (64 40 ret -> 64 60 win; 46 23 ret -> 46 63 60 win)?
NO

20) Challenger choices: ranking points/entry list quality or diversity of continents/timezones?
TIME ZONES

21) Possible exception: Accepting picks 1/2/3/4/5 minutes after the deadline?
NOOOO
__________________
Be so happy that when others look at you , they become happy too
buji is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote