MensTennisForums.com - View Single Post - Why Are All The Flukes At The AO?

View Single Post

Old 11-15-2012, 09:47 AM   #43
country flag Burrow
Registered User
 
Burrow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 18,044
Burrow has a reputation beyond reputeBurrow has a reputation beyond reputeBurrow has a reputation beyond reputeBurrow has a reputation beyond reputeBurrow has a reputation beyond reputeBurrow has a reputation beyond reputeBurrow has a reputation beyond reputeBurrow has a reputation beyond reputeBurrow has a reputation beyond reputeBurrow has a reputation beyond reputeBurrow has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Why Are All The Flukes At The AO?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Han Solo View Post
Agreed. Of course Nadal, Djokovic, and Murray are excellent players, but the fact other players made major finals before these guys hit their peak does not detract from those performances.

I particularly enjoyed Baghdatis's surprise run at AO. And he played amazing tennis that fortnight. He was rather unfortunate to meet Federer - who was pretty much unbeatable that year off clay...
Baghdatis had an enormous chance against Federer. A set, 2-0 and a break point for a double break. Federer wasn't as convincing with his performances in Australia as he was in 2004, 2005 (Yes, he lost to Safin in the SF, but the 2005 AO version of Federer trumps the 2006 version) and 2007. He was pushed to the limits by Davydenko and Haas and looked to be more of the same from Kiefer and Baghdatis but both didn't have enough left in the tank. Big opportunities missed by all of these men.
Burrow is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote