Originally Posted by GOATsol
Federer actually has the game to win slams on all different surfaces.
Nadull on the other hand was lucky that he played in this era. If the courts were fast, he would have 0 slams off clay.
frauderer wouldn't be sniffing the french open in the 90s
he might have a better head to head with nadal though; he wouldn't get far enough in clay tournaments to meet him