Originally Posted by Dougie
I dont´t get the point of this thread. Obviously some players ( like Tipsy and Pashanski) have a habit of sometimes retiring when they are in a losing position even if they are not injured. But that doesn´t mean every player who retires when not leading is doing the same. Take the result above; does anyone here have any idea WHY Dancevic retired?? I don´t think so. In many of these cases the retirement is likely due to an injury, which might well be the reason the player is in a losing position in the first place. So just because Tipsy is a jerk, no need to label every retired player too.
Actually Dancevic is well-known for his erratic behaviour... he retired down 3 MPs against Janowicz, for example.