Originally Posted by uxyzapenje
When I say Novak would have beaten Murray if there wasn't for the wind, you bedrep me. And now you say Murray would beat Roger if there wasn't for the roof. Double standards much?
I was being sarcastic here. I'm just trying to say that if the US final was ruined by conditions, you could say the same for Wimbledon. The conditions are the conditions, whoever adapts to the better deserves to win.