Originally Posted by Tag
ferrer has had the better career
more titles, more finals, higher ranked, better grand slam performance (1 final does not beat several more semis and quarters)
ferrer might not deliver against federer or nadal (on clay), but he beats everyone else. berdych loses to everyone and anyone
berdych deserves credit for treating every match against federer as a slam final
that's about it
Except when it really matters (well not at all, v. Federer). Other than Murray on clay and a suspect Nadal at AO, I'm not sure Ferrer's ever beaten one of the big four on a big stage.
I'm not discounting Ferrer's consistency, I'm questioning his upside. He'd never be able to go through two of the big four the way Berdych did at Wimbledon, and I doubt he'd beat one of them on their best surface on a big stage the way Berd just did Fed.
His role in the top five is comparable to that of a gatekeeper. He can shut out the rest, but he hasn't seriously threatened to move upward either.
Originally Posted by Mark Lenders
Should that happen, the outcome would be 24-0
he'd get a few more sets, though.