MensTennisForums.com - View Single Post - Will Nadal be better than Ferrer at the age of 31?

View Single Post

Old 11-08-2012, 05:52 PM   #16
country flag Mountaindewslave
Registered User
 
Mountaindewslave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 8,516
Mountaindewslave has a reputation beyond reputeMountaindewslave has a reputation beyond reputeMountaindewslave has a reputation beyond reputeMountaindewslave has a reputation beyond reputeMountaindewslave has a reputation beyond reputeMountaindewslave has a reputation beyond reputeMountaindewslave has a reputation beyond reputeMountaindewslave has a reputation beyond reputeMountaindewslave has a reputation beyond reputeMountaindewslave has a reputation beyond reputeMountaindewslave has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Will Nadal be better than Ferrer at the age of 31?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nole Rules View Post
Matches played so far:

Ferrer: 729 Age: 31
Nadal: 705 Age: 26

Nadal almost played as much as Ferrer even though he is 4 years younger than him.
this... just too many miles on his body. but I do see a few more slams, maybe a solid career up until 29, maybe 30. he won't play unless he can still be dominant, just look at the last few months. he probably could have already come back but he is OCD about being in perfect playing condition. if he begins to decline or injuries probe him constantly, he will just retire.

I see 2 more good years
__________________
<3 Roger Federer <3 David Ferrer <3 Juan Martin Del Potro <3 Ernest Gulbis <3

------------------------ <3 Richard Gasquet <3

Rafael Nadal
Mountaindewslave is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote