Originally Posted by Thunderfish8
I vote against because it will be hard to manage WC
- WC for challenger champions - it's impossible every CH winner to have ATP WC, because Challengers are more than ATP levels. Also if I win 1st week challenger I took WC for Sydney and if someone won Challenger before Masters he took WC for Masters, this is honest?
- WC points based system - who will run this system?
- Managers choice - it's not fair,because there always will be conspirations
- WC for managers - They will manage because of WC, not like now. Now managers like game and that's the reason to manage.
No, for example we have a thousand of Brazil players and only one tournaments, and we have several tournaments in france and only 3-4 players from that county