Originally Posted by Sapeod
If Sampras was so talented and could adapt his game to different surfaces then why was he so terrible on clay?
He would not win any slams, simple as that. His talent would only get him so far. In other words, he'd be a solid top player but not a slam winner.
federer defeated murray in wimbledon using much volley`s game.....sampras was much better in the net than federer.
if murray is an slam winner , sampras not???