MensTennisForums.com - View Single Post - More important for one's GOAT resume: Slams or Time Spent at #1?

View Single Post

Old 10-07-2012, 01:35 AM   #63
country flag uxyzapenje
Registered User
 
uxyzapenje's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: At home.
Posts: 3,974
uxyzapenje has a reputation beyond reputeuxyzapenje has a reputation beyond reputeuxyzapenje has a reputation beyond reputeuxyzapenje has a reputation beyond reputeuxyzapenje has a reputation beyond reputeuxyzapenje has a reputation beyond reputeuxyzapenje has a reputation beyond reputeuxyzapenje has a reputation beyond reputeuxyzapenje has a reputation beyond reputeuxyzapenje has a reputation beyond reputeuxyzapenje has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: More important for one's GOAT resume: Slams or Time Spent at #1?

Slams. But I voted for weeks at #1 bcs I don't think is THAT big of a difference as the poll shows it. I think the question would be like 1 Slam > 1 full year as #1 or 1 Slam < 1 full year as #1... Or if Ferrer or Delpo (or any non current top4 player) would (or was since now there's no chance for that to happen) somehow be ranked no1 at the end of this year, with Novak, Rafa, Roger and Andy winning 1 Slam each, who would be the best player of the year?
__________________
Djokovic | Tipsarevic | Querrey
uxyzapenje is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote