MensTennisForums.com - View Single Post - More important for one's GOAT resume: Slams or Time Spent at #1?

View Single Post

Old 10-06-2012, 03:08 AM   #20
country flag Freak3yman84
Registered User
 
Freak3yman84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 11,056
Freak3yman84 has a reputation beyond reputeFreak3yman84 has a reputation beyond reputeFreak3yman84 has a reputation beyond reputeFreak3yman84 has a reputation beyond reputeFreak3yman84 has a reputation beyond reputeFreak3yman84 has a reputation beyond reputeFreak3yman84 has a reputation beyond reputeFreak3yman84 has a reputation beyond reputeFreak3yman84 has a reputation beyond reputeFreak3yman84 has a reputation beyond reputeFreak3yman84 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: More important for one's GOAT resume: Slams or Time Spent at #1?

Quote:
Originally Posted by rocketassist View Post
1 GS, Olympic gold and 8 MS plus #1 is ahead of 1 GS, 4 MS and #1 even if he had less weeks than Roddick did.

Unless there's an outrageous amount of weeks at the top e.g. Lendl's 270, then it's no contest for me.
But that has nothing to do with GS > #1 Murray only goes ahead by MS and Olympic Gold so it's off the topic of GS's.
__________________
Oh Sheesh Y'all, 'Twas A Dream

Number of Times I've Cried Over Sucking at FITD: All but four

W Samarkand Singles W Charlottesville W Lermontov W ATP Bastad W Bol Fut (w/MathMul) W Cordenons (w/dinkulpus)

Quote:
Originally Posted by @Sweet Cleopatra View Post
I like how you make me appreciate my life by comparing it to yours then I take a deep breath and say: Thank God..
Freak3yman84 is online now View My Blog!   Reply With Quote