MensTennisForums.com - View Single Post - Endless Era Debates

View Single Post

Old 08-27-2012, 09:24 AM   #91
country flag 70-68
Registered User
 
70-68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 823
70-68 has a reputation beyond repute70-68 has a reputation beyond repute70-68 has a reputation beyond repute70-68 has a reputation beyond repute70-68 has a reputation beyond repute70-68 has a reputation beyond repute70-68 has a reputation beyond repute70-68 has a reputation beyond repute70-68 has a reputation beyond repute70-68 has a reputation beyond repute70-68 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Do you think this era will be remembered as a subpar era?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redeyz View Post
This is one of if not the strongest era, where you have more than one player able to win a slam. You have three very solid players competing at the highest levels, battling it out in nearly every slam.
This can be said about every other 'eras'. There have never been an era when only one player was able to win slams.
And actually, in other eras, we had more than 2 or 3 players winning multiple slams, but in the last several years, we had not more than 2 or 3 real contenders at the slams, and everyone else was/is labeled as 'no chance'.
70-68 is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote