Quote:
Originally Posted by Ariadne
He probably should've since had Federer been less formidable/consistent on clay, it would have made the H-H argument moot along with the psychological baggage Federer had to endure on account of all those defeats. Apparently for some Nadal tards (or anti-Fed tards for that matter), the lack of a skewed H-H would have also given Federer's status as GOAT more legitimacy.  |
Yes, that cannot be overstressed - any time a rafatard pulls the H2H 'argument', they need to be reminded that Federer, by that account, would be 'far superior' and more goat-worthy LOL player - if he was Sampras-mediocre on clay.
