MensTennisForums.com - View Single Post - There is no finish line...

View Single Post

Old 08-16-2012, 02:47 PM   #225
country flag kenneth79
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Age: 35
Posts: 115
kenneth79 has a reputation beyond reputekenneth79 has a reputation beyond reputekenneth79 has a reputation beyond reputekenneth79 has a reputation beyond reputekenneth79 has a reputation beyond reputekenneth79 has a reputation beyond reputekenneth79 has a reputation beyond reputekenneth79 has a reputation beyond reputekenneth79 has a reputation beyond reputekenneth79 has a reputation beyond reputekenneth79 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: There is no finish line...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Litotes View Post
Lendl has 22, I believe, even if they were not called Masters before 1990. Still within reach, but not in Cincy.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tennis_...and_statistics
I think this list is a bit arbitrary. The reason for this is that prior to 1990 all tournaments below Grand Slam and above the level which is now 250 were called Super Series. In that list I think they just picked the 9 richest Super Series each year and designated them as equivalent to todays` Masters when such dictinction never actually existed at the time. I have most of the World of Tennis [edited by John Barrett] yearbooks from 1970-2001 and there were no such distinctions made. What is now 500/1000 were then Super Series. Additionally you had the at times independent WCT tour.

This means that Lendls total is not quite as impressive because the top players were spread out more ie. you often had 2 super series events per week.
__________________
Roger Federer

Also like Murray , Tsonga , Nalbandian
kenneth79 is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote