Re: Endless Federer-Nadal debates (WTF vs Olympics)
Well, maybe Olympics is more "prestigious" because of once every four years thing. But what does it say about Nadal that he is unable to win a less "prestigious" tournament (worth more points than everything else other than the slams btw) that is held EVERY year. And was actually able to make the finals only ONCE. There were a lot more chances for Nadal to win the WTF and yet he was unable to. I think that speaks more to everything above this "which is more prestigious" bullcrap.