Originally Posted by Fumus
Who's faulting Federer!? I am not faulting him.
I am saying that his wins mean less without facing his rival.
And that is a retarded statement because his rival was not good enough to reach the finals. I'm sure lots of connaisseurs are saying "this wimbledon title means less because thew winner did not beat the guy who lost in round 2 to an unknown ranked 100 in the world."
Actually connaisseurs is not the proper expression to describe people who would say that. I believe pathetic nadal fangirl fits better.