Originally Posted by Action Jackson
Yes, he attacked other posters that didn't agree with his views, either on Nadal or Djokovic and thought GM was a personal fiefdom of his. No one is close to perfect, no he is not a martyr like it's being made out by some posters.
It's not the International Criminal Court, as goldenoldie said there is an email address where he can state his particular case about the banning, plus it's going to be reviewed as well.
Are we pretending it's that black and white? That he just attacked people who didn't agree with him? Aren't we going to bother to look at things in context?
Because I don't remember that being the case for Leng Jai's reduced ban for breaking a concrete rule. It was evaluated and looked at in context, rightfully and sensibly so.