Hamburg was the slowest major clay event on tour
Ah yes, the Hamburg defence.
The clay courts of Hamburg had a low bounce, though.
Nothing like the high bounce in MC, Rome or RG.
Before I get more tards on my back: I'm not suggesting that Roger is terrible on clay either, far from it
But he was able to take advantage of surface developments as well.
Originally Posted by leng jai
I've only been talking about Wimbledon and Nole/Rafito's capacity to play old on old school grass
Why focus only on that - based on assumptions - instead of opening up the debate?