MensTennisForums.com - View Single Post - 1994 WIMBLEDON ("FAST GRASS") vs. 2011 WIMBLEDON ("SLOW GRASS"): INTERESTING RESULTS

View Single Post

Old 07-29-2011, 01:52 PM   #36
country flag laurie-1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 526
laurie-1 has a reputation beyond reputelaurie-1 has a reputation beyond reputelaurie-1 has a reputation beyond reputelaurie-1 has a reputation beyond reputelaurie-1 has a reputation beyond reputelaurie-1 has a reputation beyond reputelaurie-1 has a reputation beyond reputelaurie-1 has a reputation beyond reputelaurie-1 has a reputation beyond reputelaurie-1 has a reputation beyond reputelaurie-1 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 1994 WIMBLEDON ("FAST GRASS") vs. 2011 WIMBLEDON ("SLOW GRASS"): INTERESTING RESU

Quote:
Originally Posted by philosophicalarf View Post
Wimbledon in the 90s definitely had a lower bounce, head groundsman has said as much. Not so much because of the grass change, but they roll the earth much harder than before (to make sure the grass lasts two weeks).
It can be put into two categories. The early 1990s and late 1990s. By the late 1990s the grass on centre court was considered harder and higher bouncing, aiding rallying and kick serves. Pat Cash mentioned this every Wimbledon whilst main commentator / analyst for BBC during this period.

That makes sense, both Rafter and Agassi had a lot of success with the high bouncing kick serve during that period from 1998 through 2001. Rafter previously mentioned that the grass beforehand didn't help his famous kick serve on both deuce and ad courts.
__________________
check my website

http://www.classictennismatches.net/
laurie-1 is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote