MensTennisForums.com - View Single Post - 1994 WIMBLEDON ("FAST GRASS") vs. 2011 WIMBLEDON ("SLOW GRASS"): INTERESTING RESULTS

View Single Post

Old 07-28-2011, 01:41 PM   #34
country flag philosophicalarf
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,355
philosophicalarf has a reputation beyond reputephilosophicalarf has a reputation beyond reputephilosophicalarf has a reputation beyond reputephilosophicalarf has a reputation beyond reputephilosophicalarf has a reputation beyond reputephilosophicalarf has a reputation beyond reputephilosophicalarf has a reputation beyond reputephilosophicalarf has a reputation beyond reputephilosophicalarf has a reputation beyond reputephilosophicalarf has a reputation beyond reputephilosophicalarf has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 1994 WIMBLEDON ("FAST GRASS") vs. 2011 WIMBLEDON ("SLOW GRASS"): INTERESTING RESU

Quote:
Originally Posted by Foxy View Post
I never believed 90s grass was faster than now. And rightly so after I read this study. I have on DVD lots of matches from 90s and 00s and they look more or less the same to me in terms of ball bounce/speed.
Wimbledon in the 90s definitely had a lower bounce, head groundsman has said as much. Not so much because of the grass change, but they roll the earth much harder than before (to make sure the grass lasts two weeks).
philosophicalarf is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote