MensTennisForums.com

MensTennisForums.com (http://www.menstennisforums.com/index.php)
-   General Messages (http://www.menstennisforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   how many slams do the following playing have in them? (http://www.menstennisforums.com/showthread.php?t=223729)

tests 01-27-2013 08:21 PM

how many slams do the following playing have in them?
 
Federer: I would say 1 more slam (most likely wimby or uso).

Djokovic: Yes yes, everyone is high on the djokovic band-wagon at the moment. NO one thought that djokovic would ever beat federer in slams (or murray for that matter). I see djokovic winning 3-4 slams, but not more than that. He slides way too much on hardcourts, and unless he is super-human (or on roids), it will destroy his knees sooner rather than later.

Nadal: People are over-looking nadal WAY too much. Not my favorite player by any means, but whenever he comes back from an injury, he always goes on a roll. I see nadal winning 2-3 slams (maybe even more, depending on if nole goes in a funk). Federer won't beat nadal, nor will murray.

Murray: 2-3 slams maximum IMO.

TBkeeper 01-27-2013 08:25 PM

Re: how many slams do the following playing have in them?
 
Federer: Has 17 slams now will end up with 18.
Nadal: Has 11 slams now will end up with 13.
Djokovic: Has 6 slams now will end up with 9.
Murray: Has 1 slam now will end up with 5.
so basically
F - 17 ---> 18
N - 11 ---> 13
D - 6 ---> 9
M - 1 ---> 5

tests 01-27-2013 08:27 PM

Re: how many slams do the following playing have in them?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TBkeeper (Post 13189801)
Federer: Has 17 slams now will end up with 18.
Nadal: Has 11 slams now will end up with 13.
Djokovic: Has 6 slams now will end up with 9.
Murray: Has 1 slam now will end up with 5.
so basically
F - 17 ---> 18
N - 11 ---> 13
D - 6 ---> 9
M - 1 ---> 5

Interesting. Which 3 slams do you see djokovic winning?

Murray with 5? I don't see that happening tbh..

Han Solo 01-27-2013 08:31 PM

Re: how many slams do the following playing have in them?
 
Considering both Murray and Djokovic are the same age, and Djokovic is still the better player, I can't see Murray winning more majors in the future than Djokovic wins.

I would be surprised to see Federer win more majors. Wimbledon at 30/31 felt like a swansong to me.

Nadal will win more if he can keep fit. It's a big if - but he should be able to have at least one more injury-free season, if not more. Surely he's got between two and four more majors in him??

Rogieva 01-27-2013 08:36 PM

Re: how many slams do the following playing have in them?
 
I don't see Murray with more than 2 slams. Maybe the US Open again because of the conditions.

Djoko I think will finish on about 9/10

Nadal has three more

Fed has two more. I think he will win the French again

TBkeeper 01-27-2013 08:36 PM

Re: how many slams do the following playing have in them?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by tests (Post 13189897)
Interesting. Which 3 slams do you see djokovic winning?

Murray with 5? I don't see that happening tbh..

more like.
Fed winning Wimbledon.
Nadal winning 2x RG.
Djokovic winning 2x AO , 1 USO.
Murray 2x Wimbledon , 2x USO.

janko05 01-27-2013 08:38 PM

Re: how many slams do the following playing have in them?
 
At this time I can't really see past Federer and Nadal. Djokovic? Forget about him..he's done :stupid:

GOAT = Fed 01-27-2013 08:39 PM

Re: how many slams do the following playing have in them?
 
Format is from current-----> Prediction

Federer: 17---->18
Nadal: 11---->13
Djokovic: 06---->11
Murray: 01---->02

Xenosys 01-27-2013 08:41 PM

Re: how many slams do the following playing have in them?
 
Federer probably has one more in him, most likely Wimbledon, before he retires.

Nadal, provided he makes a full recovery, about 3-4 more, including 2 French and a Wimbledon. Don't think he'll be winning any HC majors.

Djokovic : 7 more over the next 5 years (2 French, 2 AO, 1 Wimbledon, and 2 US Open's).

Murray : 4 more over the next 5 years (1 Wimbledon, 1 AO, and 1 US Open. A cheeky French perhaps when he's 27-28 and at his absolute best on clay, and the cards fall in his favour).

janko05 01-27-2013 08:45 PM

Re: how many slams do the following playing have in them?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Xenosys (Post 13190377)
Federer probably has one more in him, most likely Wimbledon, before he retires.

Nadal, provided he makes a full recovery, about 3-4 more, including 2 French and a Wimbledon. Don't think he'll be winning any HC majors.

Djokovic : 7 more over the next 5 years (2 French, 2 AO, 1 Wimbledon, and 2 US Open's).

Murray : 4 more over the next 5 years (1 Wimbledon, 1 AO, and 1 US Open. A cheeky French perhaps when he's 27-28 and at his absolute best on clay, and the cards fall in his favour).

that's more likely

TBkeeper 01-27-2013 08:46 PM

Re: how many slams do the following playing have in them?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Xenosys (Post 13190377)
Federer probably has one more in him, most likely Wimbledon, before he retires.

Nadal, provided he makes a full recovery, about 3-4 more, including 2 French and a Wimbledon. Don't think he'll be winning any HC majors.

Djokovic : 7 more over the next 5 years (2 French, 2 AO, 1 Wimbledon, and 2 US Open's).

Murray : 4 more over the next 5 years (1 Wimbledon, 1 AO, and 1 US Open. A cheeky French perhaps when he's 27-28 and at his absolute best on clay, and the cards fall in his favour).

This guys is the story of my constipation.

RubberDuckling 01-27-2013 08:48 PM

Re: how many slams do the following playing have in them?
 
Federer: The guy's finished. More a case of whether he'll win another 250 title nevermind a Slam.

Nadal: No more. Doesn't need any explanation.

Murray: 10 more, guy is a machine.

Djokovic: Pushovic to get another 15 minimum.

Over the next 4 or so years every slam will be won by either Murray or Djokovic.

70-68 01-27-2013 08:50 PM

Re: how many slams do the following playing have in them?
 
IMO
Federer 18
Nadal is difficult to predict right now because of his injury, but I'd say he will win 2 or 3 more, 13-14 total
Djokovic can win 3-4 more, 9-10
Murray will finish with 4-5

TBkeeper 01-27-2013 08:50 PM

Re: how many slams do the following playing have in them?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RubberDuckling (Post 13190609)
Federer: The guy's finished. More a case of whether he'll win another 250 title nevermind a Slam.

Nadal: No more. Doesn't need any explanation.

Murray: 10 more, guy is a machine.

Djokovic: Pushovic to get another 15 minimum.

Over the next 4 or so years every slam will be won by either Murray or Djokovic.

Let me see.
4 x 4 --> 16 =/= 10 + 15
:facepalm:

ProdigyEng 01-27-2013 08:50 PM

Re: how many slams do the following playing have in them?
 
Fed = 1 more.
Dull = 4 more minimum.
Djokovic = 6 more minimum.
Murray = 5 max.


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:36 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.