Mens Tennis Forums banner

Australian Open 2006

30K views 2K replies 41 participants last post by  Fedex 
#1 ·
Vamos David :bounce:


Sorry for the early post. However I hardly wanted to start this thread because I did it for the Masters Cup and he won. That's why. :D
 
#78 · (Edited)
gooner88 said:
So am I. He's flashy, good serve and a great BH. Can strike winners of both wings at will sometimes.
Yep, Stan's serving is very good, and both his backhand & forehand can play strong strokes at baseline. :p his match is always impressive, coz his can play many winners, but also many unforced errors. His defending is worse than the attacking, and returning & movement is not good enough (that's why he always lost to some big servers). Stan may cause trouble in the 1st set for David, but if David adapts his match rythm quickly, he will find the way. :D noted Stan has very strong fighting spirit.

BTW, I am a big Stan fan :eek: :sobbing: , so that will be difficult for me to see their match supposing they meet in 2nd round (I don't see Montanes will cause trouble to Stan) cheers for both :hug: If Stan can produce some surprise, I will be happy for him as well. :D
 
#83 ·
Yes, I wish him quick recovery!!! Looking at the draw there are some players that he plays difficult against - like Ferrer, Nieminen, Santoro. There is also Mario Ancic who is playing very well lately. So he has to be fully fit and healthy. Good luck, David!!!!
 
#84 ·
Monday OOP

David will be in the Rod Laver.

Rod Laver Arena
Start Time 11.00 AM


Women's Singles - 1st Rnd.
Lindsay Davenport (USA)[1] vs. Casey Dellacqua (AUS)

followed by
Men's Singles - 1st Rnd.
Danai Udomchoke (THA) vs. David Nalbandian (ARG)[4]

Women's Singles - 1st Rnd.
Maria Sharapova (RUS)[4] vs. Sandra Kloesel (GER)
 
#85 ·
bibi_s said:
Yes, I wish him quick recovery!!! Looking at the draw there are some players that he plays difficult against - like Ferrer, Nieminen, Santoro. There is also Mario Ancic who is playing very well lately. So he has to be fully fit and healthy. Good luck, David!!!!
And also James Blake, he could meet Nieminen in 3rd round and Blake in 4th. Both of them are on fire right now, and won titles this week.
 
#88 ·
Woodbridge on David:
"Mr Consistency of grand slams the past few years has been Nalbandian. He won the Masters Cup against Federer in November, and he's the sneaky one of all of them because he's always there and he seems to be able to get through a lot of long matches and still have enough gas in the tank.

"I call him a sneaky player because he doesn't have as big a game as a lot of the guys, but he manages his game better than most."

http://www.theage.com.au/news/tenni...-shadows/2006/01/14/1137119006902.html?page=2
 
#97 ·
sigmagirl91 said:
I'm afraid of any opponent David faces. I'm sure he's not going to take anyone lightly.
Do you mean you're afraid FOR any of David's opponents? They better beware of him? ;)

I agree.
 
#99 ·
RogiFan88 said:
Do you mean you're afraid FOR any of David's opponents? They better beware of him? ;)

I agree.
I'm afraid of and for his opponents. Although David won Shanghai and got a lot of confidence as a result, we still don't know which player will show up. We hope Shanghai David shows up. If so, then I'm afraid for his opponents. If not, then I'm afraid of his opponents.
 
#100 ·
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5744,17833906%5E2722,00.html

David and Goliath
Chip Le Grand
January 16, 2006

LET'S imagine, just for a while, that Roger Federer is not a certainty to win this year's Australian Open. That all the matches scheduled over the next two weeks, the countless balls bludgeoned and court time clocked by 127 other players, will be for something more than the honour of being the first to congratulate the world's best player on his seventh Grand Slam title.

Now, picture the face of the other player most likely to win the tournament. Is it Andy Roddick, with his monster serve and off-court charms? Is it Lleyton Hewitt, with his snarling countenance and combative ways? Or is it David Nalbandian, the only seeded player here with a winning record against Federer and the bloke who knocked him off in five grand sets in the final of last year's season-ending Masters Cup in Shanghai?

Normally, you would not expect to read anything about Nalbandian until midway through the second week of an Australian Open, where his baseline-burning, marathon matches have been known to finish long after the Channel Seven producers have gone to bed. If Marat Safin or Rafael Nadal were in town, you certainly wouldn't be reading about him now.

But if it is accepted that the winner of the Australian Open will have to beat Federer at some point, then Nalbandian has rightful claims to be considered this year's No.1 contender. He might not have the power of Roddick nor the killer instinct of Hewitt. But when it comes to beating Federer, he appears to have something that the American and local hope lack.

There are only seven men who hold a winning record against Federer after three or more matches. Of those, only Britain's Tim Henman and Nalbandian are still in the game.


It is not a surprising statistic because Federer rarely loses. In 2004 he played 80 and lost six. Last year he played 85 and lost four.

The players who beat Federer were Safin in an unforgettable semi-final at Melbourne Park, Nadal at the French Open, Richard Gasquet at another clay court event and Nalbandian in Shanghai.

Such is the expectation that Federer will win every match that he was yesterday asked about losing an exhibition match to Tommy Haas four days earlier at Kooyong.

"I mean, it happens if you don't play your best, right?" a slightly bemused Federer replied. "It is nothing new. I'm surprised I keep on winning all those matches. But it is hard to keep it you know, especially an exhibition tournament."

Yet if Federer doesn't expect to beat everyone all the time, it seems that fewer and fewer players believe they can beat Federer at any time.

Roddick has won one match against Federer in 11 attempts. His sole victory came in Montreal in 2003 and he has won one set in their six meetings since. Like every other player, Roddick has taken time off to review his game and prepare for the year ahead. He vowed to be more aggressive in his approach. How much had he thought about Federer?

"You think about it because you are trying to shoot for the best," Roddick said. "He has established himself as that in the last couple of years. Am I obsessed with it? Do I have pictures on my wall or something? No.

"I think you have to be self-motivated first and foremost. I'm not good enough to just worry about one guy. I have to worry about a whole lot of guys."

Hewitt has lost his past nine matches against Federer, stretching back to their epic Davis Cup semi-final in Melbourne in 2003. Last year's Australian Open brought out the best and worst of Hewitt, as he scrapped his way to the final against Safin. This year however, he finds himself in the same side of the draw as Federer with patchy lead-in form behind him and the same concerns about the court surface ahead.

Hewitt denies marriage and family have become a distraction, or that his appetite for a stoush has waned. "Once the bell rings, I'll be ready to go on Tuesday." But if he shapes up to Federer in a semi-final, it is hard to see Hewitt having a knock-out punch.

Which brings us back to Nalbandian.

Nalbandian's career has neatly overlapped with Federer's and of their 10 meetings, the Argentine has won six. His win against Federer in Shanghai came with an asterix attached; namely the ankle injury which put Federer on the sidelines for three weeks before the Masters Cup. For Nalbandian however, the confidence from that win has overflowed into the new tennis year.

"I feel I am still playing the 2005 season," Nalbandian said. "I still have a lot of confidence from that tournament. It made me feel a little bit different on court."

Nalbandian hasn't hit a ball in anger since Shanghai and his preparation for today's first round has not been ideal. He felt ill on the plane to Melbourne, was running a mild fever by the time he cleared customs and subsequently pulled out of the AAMI Classic at Kooyong, where he had planned to play three lead-in matches. Now he claims to be fully recovered.

Nalbandian is a tennis enigma. He is one of he most dangerous shot-makers in the game and can end a point from anywhere, on either side of his body. This was the Nalbandian who put an end to Ivan Ljubicic's hot run in Shanghai last November before outlasting an underdone Federer in the final. This is also the Nalbandian who came back from two sets down against Hewitt in last year's Australian Open to stretch the Australian to 10-8 in the fifth set and who then beat the Australian on grass in Sydney in a Davis Cup quarter-final in July.

At other times, Nalbandian has lacked the nerve to finish off an opponent. He has been a touring professional since 2000 and ranked in the world's top 10 for three years, yet has won only four ATP tournaments. He has made the quarter finals of the Australian Open three times without making it through to the last four. His one grand slam final appearance was in 2002 at Wimbledon against Hewitt when he was a virtual unknown.

Nalbandian, 24, is a year younger than Hewitt and believes there is plenty of time left to win a grand slam.

"The window is always open," Nalbandian said. "I know that if I play good I can beat anyone. I have to be prepared match by match and try to do my best all the time that I go out on court. If I play good, I have the windows open to win every match."

Rarely though, does an opportunity present in a grand slam as it has for Nalbandian at Melbourne Park. He is on the opposite side of the draw to Federer and on paper his quarter is the softest in the tournament.

If the bookies and pundits are right, then the tournament is only Federer's to win anyway. But just for a while, imagine it is someone else's. Now, is it David Nalbandian you see?
 
#101 ·
jazz_girl said:
I've decided to watch this match, even though it means I will only sleep for about one or two hours :mad: I have to wake up at 5am to go to work!!!!

Me too...actually I have no work tomorrow so I am okay...I have some other things to do in the afternoon...so I will go to sleep at about 7pm tonight...get up at midnight and watch the match...and suffer from lack of sleep the day after all of David's matches..I hope they show his matches here...you just never know with Eurosport...they seem to like women's tennis a lot on that channel :mad:
 
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top