MensTennisForums.com - Reply to Topic

Thread: James Blake is a good player but is not Slam material... Reply to Thread
Title:
Message:
Trackback:
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:
 

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MensTennisForums.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

  Topic Review (Newest First)
05-04-2011 08:04 PM
Lopez
Re: James Blake is a good player but is not Slam material...

Nevenez bumping old threads all over the place... What's up bro?
05-04-2011 07:57 PM
Sham Kay Adams
Re: James Blake is a good player but is not Slam material...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lindsayfan View Post
i dont think someone expects Blake to win a Slam...he's just a good player and a cute boy,not a phenomenon like Roddick
Hear that? Roddick a phenomenon, and not an eyelid was batted.

Good times.
05-04-2011 07:56 PM
Sham Kay Adams
Re: James Blake is a good player but is not Slam material...

Quote:
Originally Posted by tennisfan856 View Post
I am sure the poster whose last post was 6 years ago will appreciate this pat on the back.
I'm sure the poster sneezed his approval.
05-04-2011 07:25 PM
evilmindbulgaria
Re: James Blake is a good player but is not Slam material...

His best chance was USO'05. I still can't believe he choked that final set to Agassi!
05-04-2011 03:45 PM
timafi
Re: James Blake is a good player but is not Slam material...

NEVER was!
05-04-2011 02:45 PM
nevenez
Re: James Blake is a good player but is not Slam material...

Quote:
Originally Posted by guichard View Post
Even then it is what 4-8 players since 2003 if we are generous.
That seems a pretty good number.
Slams aren't for everyone, if they were for everyone this would mean that the general level was pretty low.
05-04-2011 02:39 PM
guichard
Re: James Blake is a good player but is not Slam material...

Quote:
Originally Posted by nevenez View Post
For me Slam material means arriving at Slam SF with consistency.
Even then it is what 4-8 players since 2003 if we are generous.
05-04-2011 02:37 PM
nevenez
Re: James Blake is a good player but is not Slam material...

So you think i'm a troll?
Seems that people are making wrong assumptions.
05-04-2011 02:33 PM
Fumus
Re: James Blake is a good player but is not Slam material...

Quote:
Originally Posted by tennisfan856 View Post
I am sure the poster whose last post was 6 years ago will appreciate this pat on the back.
Especially coming from the poster who has contributed such great threads to MTF as "Boobs or Ass" and "What's your IQ?"

Mods, can we please lock these ancient troll threads so they never see the light of day again?
05-04-2011 01:31 PM
wildemu
Re: James Blake is a good player but is not Slam material...

Quote:
Originally Posted by nevenez View Post
8 years later we can say that you were Right
I am sure the poster whose last post was 6 years ago will appreciate this pat on the back.
05-04-2011 01:17 PM
nevenez
Re: James Blake is a good player but is not Slam material...

Quote:
Originally Posted by barbadosan View Post
For heavens sake, if by slam material you mean winning a slam, how many people HAVE been slam material since then, and after 2003??? It's not like there were dozens of candidates breaking down the door and winning slams, unless they were mostly called Federer and Nadal
For me Slam material means arriving at Slam SF with consistency.
05-04-2011 01:06 PM
OnyxRose
Re: James Blake is a good player but is not Slam material...

Seriously, dude. Go read a book if you're bored.
05-04-2011 01:06 PM
barbadosan
Re: James Blake is a good player but is not Slam material...

Quote:
Originally Posted by nevenez View Post
8 years later we can say that you were Right
For heavens sake, if by slam material you mean winning a slam, how many people HAVE been slam material since then, and after 2003??? It's not like there were dozens of candidates breaking down the door and winning slams, unless they were mostly called Federer and Nadal
05-04-2011 12:51 PM
nevenez
Re: James Blake is a good player but is not Slam material...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ace Tracker View Post
just IMHO, and I confess that I haven't followed Blake's game for long, but from what I've seen, I don't think he will ever be a force to be reckoned with in Grand Slams...a good player that will probably have a decent career and results, a la Andrei Pavel or MaliVai Washington for example, but hardly the Slam titlist and answer to Sampras and Agassi's retirement that the American Media is hopeing for...not trying to belittle the mentioned players' careers, but where Roddick's game still has lots of room for improvement, I think James is playing almost as good as he can right now...
8 years later we can say that you were Right
12-24-2007 10:40 AM
dl05
Re: James Blake is a good player but is not Slam material...

I dont ever think the tennis world expects Blake to win a slam anytime soon. He's definitely improved so much over the last couple of years( albeit his mediocre 2007 didnt exactly do him any favours ranking wise), but he's been a top player in those years nonetheless.

If you were to watch tennis for the first time, you'd probably question why he hasnt won a slam yet. I mean he has a ballistic forehand, superb footspeed and let's face it- is physically in extremely good shape. However, blake has very major flaws that hold him back in matches, particulary at Slam level:

1) Serve can lose it's consistency, and generally his serving % isnt that impressive anyway, so it really hampers him against the likes of Federer, Djokovic etc.

2) So mentally fragile in big matches IMO. Evidence being his extremely poor record in five set matches where he just cant finish the match off e.g. against Agassi and Haas at the US Open in 2005 and 07.

3) His shot selection is questionable. I do feel his game has become more structured in recent years(largely building on constructing the point with the serve and the forehand), but he is prone to very bizarre thought processes. Still has that flashy exuberance of 2002/03, which he still turns into sometimes.The backhand starts sparying errors etc.


Dont get me wrong, i think Blake is a good player and has done so well to break into the top 10 when you consider his personal tragedies and potentially life-threatening injuries, but i feel Blake will never be a 'great' player. However it's no disgrace, as he's living a career far beyond what people would've thought 5 years ago. Unfortunately for Blake, a slam is out of the question IMO.
This thread has more than 15 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome