MensTennisForums.com - Reply to Topic
Thread: ca roger beat jmac's record? Reply to Thread
Title:
Message:
Trackback:
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:
 

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MensTennisForums.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

  Topic Review (Newest First)
09-12-2005 12:13 AM
R.Federer
Re: ca roger beat jmac's record?

Yes, but Macenroe's record is from beginning to the last match of the year.

Even if Roge wins next three tournament and goes 85-3, there is chance he loses 2 matches after that and the record percent will go away again. So yes, he can reach to 82-3, but I am not confident he can maintain that % (82/85=.964) for the whole year
09-12-2005 12:11 AM
nkhera1
Re: ca roger beat jmac's record?

Quote:
Originally Posted by megadeth
he's now 70-3 i think. if he wins 3 straight tourneys, he can get at least 85-3.

that would eclipse jma'c 82-3.

possible?
Because there are no more clay tournaments and this is Federer we are talking about then yes this is very possible.
09-12-2005 12:10 AM
megadeth
ca roger beat jmac's record?

he's now 70-3 i think. if he wins 3 straight tourneys, he can get at least 85-3.

that would eclipse jma'c 82-3.

possible?

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome