MensTennisForums.com - Reply to Topic

Thread: MTF: How is the Australian Open viewed as a "grand slam"? Reply to Thread
Title:
Message:
Trackback:
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:
 

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MensTennisForums.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

  Topic Review (Newest First)
01-30-2013 03:05 AM
Looner
Re: MTF: How is the Australian Open viewed as a "grand slam"?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Topspindoctor View Post
And make Basel a slam instead. That was Noserer extremists can boast that Pink Shoes has 20+ slams already.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Oracle View Post
Lets make it a 250 event so we can diminish Novak's accomplishments.
All good ideas.
01-30-2013 01:36 AM
Topspindoctor
Re: MTF: How is the Australian Open viewed as a "grand slam"?

And make Basel a slam instead. That was Noserer extremists can boast that Pink Shoes has 20+ slams already.
01-30-2013 01:32 AM
Mr. Oracle
Re: MTF: How is the Australian Open viewed as a "grand slam"?

Lets make it a 250 event so we can diminish Novak's accomplishments.

01-29-2013 11:55 PM
Looner
Re: MTF: How is the Australian Open viewed as a "grand slam"?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Orka_n View Post
Australian open, personal opinions

Surface: Worst. I hate slow HC.
Crowd: Best. Shared perhaps with wimbledon.
Organisation & schedule: Best.
Watchability (for me): Worst, due to time zones.
Historic prestige: Lowest of the slams.
Weather: Best

All in all I like AO a lot. I personally rate it on the same level as RG and Wimby. USO is below.
This! My desire to visit the AO has really been fuelled by how cool the Aussies are as people and tennis fans but the surface is so shit it makes me cry when I think I started following the sport because of the wonderful AO matches of the early noughties.
01-29-2013 11:50 PM
Super Djoker
Re: MTF: How is the Australian Open viewed as a "grand slam"?

Well how is the US Open the strongest when all the players are likely to be tired or carrying a injury ? It is as much a Slam as any other . Do you realise how much success at the French is purely down to strength and stamina ? It is hugely based on this . Wimbledon is largely down to attacking tennis and serve and volley . The players should be nice and fresh for the Aussie Open Although it,s original spot of being played in December may have been better !
01-29-2013 12:42 PM
zeleni
Re: MTF: How is the Australian Open viewed as a "grand slam"?

Quote:
Originally Posted by choppaa View Post
The only thing AO doesn't have is rich tradition. Regarding organization it wipes the floor with both RG and USO.
list of AO winners looks very impressive: federer, sampras, nadal, agassi, lendl, etc. who is missing besides borg?
AO has some "fluke" winners, but so does wimbledon.
01-29-2013 12:35 PM
choppaa
Re: MTF: How is the Australian Open viewed as a "grand slam"?

The only thing AO doesn't have is rich tradition. Regarding organization it wipes the floor with both RG and USO.
01-29-2013 12:16 PM
zeleni
Re: MTF: How is the Australian Open viewed as a "grand slam"?

yup, just seen trolling (or, perhaps, genuine bitching?) about relevance of australian open in the final match thread. nice inducement to repeat why is AO the best GS in last 10+ years:

* best weather;
* best scheduling (theoretically, RG has better scheduling, but they usually *get screwed by dark and rain);
* best crowd;
* first slam to have retractable roof on main court;
* night matches under the lights. AO > RG
* most player-friendly grand slam, as contemporary champion and other players assert. more important - AO is the most regular and fair-play oriented grand slam, because of:

- no stupid sunday in the middle of tournament. "tradition"? what tradition? what is the point of christian tradition in sport event in antichrist country? particularly if it hurts another supposed local tradition more relevant in sport event - fair-play. as if regular rain isn't enough, stupid sunday often screws schedule of some players and puts them in unfavourable position. therefore AO is more regular tournament than wimbledon, hence, inevitably, AO > W.

- no stupid saturday at the end of tournament. stupid saturday forces finalists to play the most important matches in tournament in bo5 format in two consecutive days, and potentially puts second finalist in unfavourable position after eventual long sf match. how dumb is that? AO > USO.

thank you australian open, the best grand slam.

(some subjective reasons, not relevant for everyone, can be added too, like favourite surface or sight of sunshine and summer while freezing in the winter.)
01-28-2013 10:44 PM
Orka_n Australian open, personal opinions

Surface: Worst. I hate slow HC.
Crowd: Best. Shared perhaps with wimbledon.
Organisation & schedule: Best.
Watchability (for me): Worst, due to time zones.
Historic prestige: Lowest of the slams.
Weather: Best

All in all I like AO a lot. I personally rate it on the same level as RG and Wimby. USO is below.
01-28-2013 10:29 PM
rocketassist
Re: MTF: How is the Australian Open viewed as a "grand slam"?

Quote:
Originally Posted by tektonac View Post
USO is at the Oktoberfest Tennis Mixer level.
It's just cause delpo won it

They're all pretty equal these days I think. Back in Henman's prime, an AO or USO would not be accepted in the misguided British public's eyes, only Wimbledon.
01-28-2013 10:17 PM
tektonac
Re: MTF: How is the Australian Open viewed as a "grand slam"?

Quote:
Originally Posted by End da Game View Post
Historic prestige:

wimbledon >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> USO >>> RG >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AO



Reality of today:

USO >>> AO >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > irrelevant surface slams
USO is at the Oktoberfest Tennis Mixer level.
01-28-2013 10:16 PM
Sauletekis
Re: MTF: How is the Australian Open viewed as a "grand slam"?

To OOP: Please, keep posting on TF, but ONLY there! I can see you fit there perfectly.
01-28-2013 10:08 PM
Branimir
Re: MTF: How is the Australian Open viewed as a "grand slam"?

Apart from some very hot days, this slam offers almost perfect conditions. The only slam that offers close to perfect conditions!
01-28-2013 10:04 PM
PedroMarquess
Re: MTF: How is the Australian Open viewed as a "grand slam"?

My 2nd fave after Wimbledon.
01-28-2013 09:59 PM
arm
Re: MTF: How is the Australian Open viewed as a "grand slam"?

It's my second favorite after the USO. Pretty much tied with RG, but has the slight edge.

There's something about it that makes it sort of perfect, as other players have stated: organization, weather, timing (right after the off season).

And let's not forget the crowd, we have to admit that the ozzies are the best slam crowd by miles.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roy Emerson View Post
This is actually a Djokovic bashing thread.
I can't believe most people have actually been so rational so far, hope it stays this way.
This thread has more than 15 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome