MensTennisForums.com - Reply to Topic
Thread: Endless Era Debates Reply to Thread
Title:
Message:
Trackback:
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:
 

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MensTennisForums.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

  Topic Review (Newest First)
Yesterday 03:54 PM
evilmindbulgaria
Re: If 04-07 was a weak era, what was 01-03?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tutsi Frutsi View Post
You can deny reality, but Nadal has the same vulturing essence like Ferrer, just that Rafa's weapons are more powerful, so he could fool naive tards like you.
Dude, you have been trying waaay too hard lately...
Yesterday 03:31 PM
Three Days Grace
Re: If 04-07 was a weak era, what was 01-03?

Quote:
Originally Posted by blackwell View Post
You mean, that Ukrainian mug also turned into top-5 player after beating Fed ?? I don't care TBH
As soon as someone showed old school S&V tennis at relatively decent level, "grass GOAT" was exposed. Says a lot about Federer's chances in 90s.
Yesterday 01:40 PM
Matt01
Re: If 04-07 was a weak era, what was 01-03?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tutsi Frutsi View Post
I don't know about all Slams, but certainly all his hardcourt Slams, Masters and Olympics aren't worth a penny without proving his talent in the most competetive tournament WTF.

Did you ever notice that the WTF is a bad tournament for Rafa because it is indoors and the ball bounce is low?
Nadal beat HC GOAT Djokovic (who happens to be in your sig) to win his US Open titles and the Olympics, what more do you want from him or which other players you want him to beat until you stop polluting this forum with your vulture crap?
Yesterday 01:39 PM
Singularity
Re: Endless Era Debates

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greatness View Post
It just so happens that Federer's level always varied when he played teenagers. That's the excuse? Ok.
Not only teenagers. He also lost to Costa, Hrbaty and Volandri and came close to losing to a guy ranked outside the top 1000.
Yesterday 01:27 PM
DinnerWarrior
Re: Endless Era Debates

Keep up the good clownwork please, guys :>D
Yesterday 01:25 PM
Tutsi Frutsi
Re: If 04-07 was a weak era, what was 01-03?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt01 View Post
Nadal vultured 14 Slams, yeah right.
I don't know about all Slams, but certainly all his hardcourt Slams, Masters and Olympics aren't worth a penny without proving his talent in the most competetive tournament WTF. One could argue that if WTF was on clay Nadal still wouldn't have won because of concentrated field of only top-8 players which's still Nadal's worst nightmare even though he started losing to journeymen in Wimbledon long time ago.
Yesterday 01:17 PM
Matt01
Re: If 04-07 was a weak era, what was 01-03?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tutsi Frutsi View Post
You can deny reality, but Nadal has the same vulturing essence like Ferrer, just that Rafa's weapons are more powerful, so he could fools naive tards like you.

Nadal vultured 14 Slams, yeah right.
Yesterday 01:16 PM
Tutsi Frutsi
Re: If 04-07 was a weak era, what was 01-03?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt01 View Post
A few of my bain cells just died after reading this BS.
You can deny reality, but Nadal has the same vulturing essence like Ferrer, just that Rafa's weapons are more powerful, so he could fool naive tards like you.
Yesterday 01:09 PM
blackwell
Re: If 04-07 was a weak era, what was 01-03?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Three Days Grace View Post
...
You mean, that Ukrainian mug also turned into top-5 player after beating Fed ?? I don't care TBH
Yesterday 01:05 PM
Matt01
Re: If 04-07 was a weak era, what was 01-03?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tutsi Frutsi View Post
Yep, 1 WTF > Nadal's AO-09 + USO-10 + USO-13.

A few of my bain cells just died after reading this BS.
Yesterday 12:20 PM
Three Days Grace
Re: If 04-07 was a weak era, what was 01-03?

Quote:
Originally Posted by blackwell View Post
Yes. Like Rosol, Brown, Darcic etc. turned from top-200 into top-5 players beating Nadal
Yesterday 12:08 PM
blackwell
Re: If 04-07 was a weak era, what was 01-03?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Three Days Grace View Post
At particular tournament you compete with TOP-8 AT THE MOMENT, not TOP-8 of last 52 weeks. For example, AO-09. Verdasco has beaten two TOP-8 players - Murray and Tsonga. It means Nando was a tougher opponent to play against than these two. Djokovic didn't face any TOP-8 on the way to Wimby and USO finals in 2015. It only means there were players who were stronger than some TOP8 ones during the tournament.
Yes. Like Rosol, Brown, Darcic etc. turned from top-200 into top-5 players after beating Nadal
Yesterday 11:48 AM
Three Days Grace
Re: If 04-07 was a weak era, what was 01-03?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tutsi Frutsi View Post
To win WTF you have to go through 3 top-8 players at the very least. Look at Nadal's AO-09, USO-10, USO-13 victories, he won those tournaments facing only 1 top-8 player in each of them.

Seems like Nadal is even a bigger vulture than Federer
At particular tournament you compete with TOP-8 AT THE MOMENT, not TOP-8 of last 52 weeks. For example, AO-09. Verdasco has beaten two TOP-8 players - Murray and Tsonga. It means Nando was a tougher opponent to play against than these two. Djokovic didn't face any TOP-8 on the way to Wimby and USO finals in 2015. It only means there were players who were stronger than some TOP8 ones during the tournament.
Yesterday 11:05 AM
Tutsi Frutsi
Re: If 04-07 was a weak era, what was 01-03?

Quote:
Originally Posted by blackwell View Post
Yes. That's why Nadal has never won it
Yep, 1 WTF > Nadal's AO-09 + USO-10 + USO-13.
Yesterday 10:56 AM
blackwell
Re: If 04-07 was a weak era, what was 01-03?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Three Days Grace View Post
At WTF, though, you would play against TOP8 player anyway, despite he is not a real TOP8 at the moment.
Yes. That's why Nadal has never won it
This thread has more than 15 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome