MensTennisForums.com - Reply to Topic

Thread: Tsonga: Referees always favor top 4 Reply to Thread
Title:
Message:
Trackback:
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:
 

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MensTennisForums.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

  Topic Review (Newest First)
10-10-2012 03:07 PM
duong
Re: Tsonga: Referees always favor top 4

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sophitia36 View Post
Well, I think it's difficult to decide when it's appropriate to make comments and when it's better to shut up. The problem is, if you make such comments after losing, they will inevitably be perceived as excuses brought up by a frustrated loser.
Tsonga doesn't think about those reactions, he just says his mind sincerely, and deal with it.

As Fed once said :

Quote:
For his part, Federer said he sometimes regretted his answers and how they were interpreted. But for the most-interviewed athlete in a star-driven sport, “that’s part of who we are,” he said.

“We are normal people,” Federer said. “If you’re not allowed to speak your mind, what’s the point?”
(source : http://http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/03/sports/tennis/roger-federer-takes-on-news-media-interviews-like-pro.html?pagewanted=1&_r=2&ref=tennis

Besides, it was only one point in his interview, he also praised Djokovic very high (hence also the "resignation" comments some people made, but well you can be sure Tsonga will fight next he faces one top-4, just as Berdych did in the US Open after saying some "resigned" comments), the main problem with this kind of comments is rather that people extract one little point from a whole interview and speak as if it's the only thing he said and insisted on saying. Just no. He said it and skipped to something else, that's all.
10-10-2012 02:50 PM
duong
Re: Tsonga: Referees always favor top 4

Quote:
Originally Posted by DrJules View Post
Would a lower ranked player be allowed as much time between serving points as Nadal and Djokovic often take; I am not sure they would. .
you can be sure they wouldn't : I remember an article where many players were questioned on that and it was obvious for them : there's a "special allowance" for Nadal on that case, but they can be sanctioned anyway.

I still remember when Cilic got a warning for time wasting just before a second serve against Fed on breakpoint against him in the US Open. And he had not taken so much time !

And in such cases, of course, players other than the top-4 tend to happen to think that they're not ruled the same as the others for every decision, not just time-wasting. It's just a natural process, that's why Tsonga is not the only one thinking that
10-10-2012 02:44 PM
duong
Re: Tsonga: Referees always favor top 4

Quote:
Originally Posted by MIMIC View Post
Umpires are starting to do that more often: award the point to the server even if you get a racket on it. Like I said before, it happened to Djokovic at the U.S. Open.

I have no problem with it. 9 times out of 10, the "out" call did not disrupt the returner and the umpire is just giving the returner the benefit of the doubt by replaying the point; they're basically placating the players. The only issue is that this call isn't made consistently across ALL umpires. But I have seen the call being made more often in the last few months.
yes, I agree with that, I like that umpires take this risk to call it this way if they do feel it, and Lahyani is typically a guy who takes more risks than other umpires.

Actually I would like umpires to do it also in rallies when there's a bad call : especially if it didn't change the outcome of the point if the ball was in rather than out, they should say that the challenge is useless rather than replaying the point. I saw this situation in a Querrey-Lu's match and I thought it was ridiculous that they replayed the point because Querrey easily won the point anyway.

And I agree with you that the main problem is that the umpiring is not consistent accross umpires (except to "forget" sanctioning wasted time against Nadal, which is clearly a "harmonized" rule).
10-10-2012 09:24 AM
Sophitia36
Re: Tsonga: Referees always favor top 4

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Lenders View Post
It doesn't matter whether or not 4 players are being benefitted at the expense of everyone else? Can hardly think of anything more relevant.

And good that Jo made such a comment, someone has to. Shame Berdych and especially Ferrer didn't have the balls to do so after getting screwed in the USO semis this year to increase the likelihood of a 'Big 4' final.
Well, I think it's difficult to decide when it's appropriate to make comments and when it's better to shut up. The problem is, if you make such comments after losing, they will inevitably be perceived as excuses brought up by a frustrated loser.
But at the same time, when you look at Ferru who has this policy of never giving any excuse at all no matter the circumstances... Yes sometimes I do wish he would speak up and defend himself. I think one of the reasons they sometimes treat him very poorly is also that they know he won't complain. But the problem is, his choice of never complaining, which is obviously deliberate, only has value if he sticks to it constantly.

So I don't know what the right attitude is. Maybe several players would need to get together to denounce the system, then it would be more powerful. They could still denounce them collectively as sore losers but that would be more difficult.


Sorry if it's off-topic, but it reminds me of controversies in ice-skating (which is worse since it relies entirely on judges). One of my favourite couples in ice dance was from Lithuania, and they were shamlessly undermarked for their entire career. They were always extremely classy about it and almost never complained, even though their results were becoming increasingly outrageous and many observers were beginning to notice it.
Then, during the Salt Lake Olympics, it was even worse than usual (because that time, two of the couples ranked ahead of them had actually fallen heavily) and Lithuania filed an official complaint.
But the problem is, the system and the power of the media make it so, that there is also a double standard when judging complaints. So while the Canadians, backed by the American media, were making an incredible amount of fuss about losing to the Russians (which I think was not unfair at all), made sure all hell broke loose and successfully got a reversal of the jugding, no one anywhere paid any attention to the Lithuanian dancers.
In the end, what happened is that later in the same season, the judges repeated the offence, and that time, it was such a cruel blow to them that they did openly show their discontent and spoke up during press conferences.
What was extraordinary was that other competitors initiated a petition complaining about the judging in general, and the way this couple in particular had been treated throughout their career, and all the other competitors (except the ones that had benefitted from the judges' decision) signed it.
And there was a result: because of this (and other scandals), they changed the system. I'm not sure it's really much different now, to be honest, but at least something was done.

So, possibly, collective action is where the answer lies? If there really is a system protecting the Big 4, then maybe what is needed is a petition or a complaint by several players, not just one, in order to give it more credibility?
10-10-2012 08:13 AM
dencod16
Re: Tsonga: Referees always favor top 4

Of course the referees will favor those who can pull in crowds. other than the top 4, currently there is no one that can come close to them in popularity. The referee will always go with them and locals.
10-10-2012 06:17 AM
niff
Re: Tsonga: Referees always favor top 4

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sham Kay View Post
Tsonga just lost his top 5-10 ranking privileges from Umpires
10-10-2012 02:14 AM
Topspindoctor
Quote:
Originally Posted by GOATsol View Post
The thing is that no players should get preferential treatment from umpires.

Telling Clownga to become a Top 4 player is irrelevant.

'Should' and 'How things really are' are two very different things. Time for Clownga and some posters here to face the reality.

Should the umpires treat everyone equally? Yes. Will it ever happen? No. Nadal, Federer and Djokovic are not the first and certainly not the last to abuse the system. When they are gone, someone else who wins many slams will take their place.
10-10-2012 02:02 AM
GOATsol
Re: Tsonga: Referees always favor top 4

Quote:
Originally Posted by Topspindoctor View Post
What planet are you from? That has always been the case in all aspects of life, not just in pro sports. Clownga is just bitter because he is not good enough to take advantage. Umpires shitting their pants when a player looks at them is a privilege that was earned by the big 3. They all were journeymen at some point. When Clownga wins multiple slams, he can also benefit, until then he's just a butthurt scrub who come off as a whiner.
The thing is that no players should get preferential treatment from umpires.

Telling Clownga to become a Top 4 player is irrelevant.
10-10-2012 02:02 AM
Sham Kay Adams
Re: Tsonga: Referees always favor top 4

Tsonga just lost his top 5-10 ranking privileges from Umpires
10-10-2012 01:03 AM
Naudio Spanlatine
Re: Tsonga: Referees always favor top 4

Ok why does this have to be a discussion about what anyone says really, this is not looking good.
10-10-2012 12:52 AM
Topspindoctor
Re: Tsonga: Referees always favor top 4

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Lenders View Post
However, I can also understand him. It must be frustrating to see the same players getting preferential treatment time and again in every respect. .
What planet are you from? That has always been the case in all aspects of life, not just in pro sports. Clownga is just bitter because he is not good enough to take advantage. Umpires shitting their pants when a player looks at them is a privilege that was earned by the big 3. They all were journeymen at some point. When Clownga wins multiple slams, he can also benefit, until then he's just a butthurt scrub who come off as a whiner.
10-10-2012 12:49 AM
nick the greek
Re: Tsonga: Referees always favor top 4

Well, tough titty Jo.Life is unfair, get used to it.
10-10-2012 12:44 AM
Mark Lenders
Re: Tsonga: Referees always favor top 4

Quote:
Originally Posted by redshift36188 View Post
Tsonga might be right, but that's not the mindset I want to see in him. It's not like he is being clearly robbed.
I agree. He should be more focused on improving his BH and ROS.

However, I can also understand him. It must be frustrating to see the same players getting preferential treatment time and again in every respect. That and the USO semis this year must be really depressing for a guy like Jo: to win a Slam, he'd always have to find a way to hit through the best defenders the game has ever seen on super slow surfaces. But that is not enough: playing better than them won't be enough, he needs to play much better than them, just better won't cut it for the reasons we know.

I don't like to see this resignation from Jo, but I'm sure it will not affect his effort to win titles and really someone had to say something. It is obviously demoralizing, he's not getting any help, that's for sure.
10-10-2012 12:35 AM
Topspindoctor
Re: Tsonga: Referees always favor top 4

When Clownga wins multiple slams, he can have the favor of the umpires. But I suspect he has no game to do so.
10-10-2012 12:31 AM
redshift36188
Re: Tsonga: Referees always favor top 4

Tsonga might be right, but that's not the mindset I want to see in him. It's not like he is being clearly robbed.
This thread has more than 15 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome