- Reply to Topic
Thread: Wild Cards Reply to Thread
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

  Topic Review (Newest First)
06-16-2011 02:42 AM
Re: Wild Cards

06-16-2011 02:30 AM
Re: Wild Cards
Before the seedings were announced, I had resolved to take a look at the list of wild cards awarded by the AEC, semi-itching to take a few shots at the choices. I confess to having a bone to pick when it comes to the wild-card culture, in which any number of dead-enders and no-hopers are rewarded simply because they hail from the nation or region where a given tournament is being played, or because said player's business representatives have found a way to wheedle a wild card for him or her. Grand Slam tournaments award eight wild cards, which takes eight places out of avdraw that's designed to accommodate players based on merit.

Given that you also have 16 qualifiers at a major tournament, the cutoff for direct entry is a ranking of No. 104 (assuming everyone with a lower numerical ranking wants to play). I can see where a pro who's worked awfully hard and nudged his ranking up to No. 106, or No. 108, might feel pretty bitter when he sees one of those eight wild-cards go to a 17-year old ranked No. 343, or a sentimental favorite.

Wimbledon has been as guilty as anyone of handing out free lunches to the undeserving over the years, but it's mainly because the British players have been such hopeless cases. It may seem like the wild card awarded to Emily Webley-Smith is a futile gesture, given that she's 27 and barely inside the Top 300. But then she's had busted up ankles, survived a bout of dengue fever, and cut her ranking almost in half since the last year-end stats were issued. Four other WTA wild cards went to British girls: Naomie Broady, Katie O'Brien, Laura Robson and Heather Watson. Sabine Lisicki and Eleni Daniilidou were the only non-British wild cards on the women's side, and the AEC didn't even bother to award the eighth wild card—the spot will go to the next player based on the direct entry rankings. Hooray.

On the men's side, three British players received wild cards—Daniel Cox, Daniel Evans, and James Ward. The latter certainly earned his, making a run to the Queen's Club final last week. But it's still hard to envision Ward stealing the thunder of Andy Murray. The other ATP wild cards went to an eclectic trio: Arnaud Clement, Alejandro Falla, and Dudi Sela. The eighth men's wild card also was unused, making me suspect that the AEC is trying hard to look like it isn't awarding the wild cards to any old player, just because it can. But you still have to wonder—wouldn't it have been more appropriate, based on a paucity of justifiable wild-card requests, to award most of those wild cards to eligible players based on ranking? I mean, we love Dudi Sela and Alejandro Falla, but what exactly is the point?

Once again, it will be interesting to see which, if any, wild card entries survive the first round. I can see Lisicki winning multiple rounds, so my money is on her. But even that wouldn't change my feeling that eight wild cards per singles draw is probably four or five too many.
06-15-2011 06:56 PM
Re: Wild Cards

No one, it was a direct acceptance for the next highest ranked player on the list...
06-15-2011 06:16 PM
Re: Wild Cards

I cannot find out anywhere who received the final wild card. Does anyone know who got it?
06-14-2011 07:38 PM
Re: Wild Cards

Why is Sela a waste? He has won his last 15 matches, he is currently ranked 81, he has just won a challenger on grass, with just one set dropped. Who would deserve more a WC than him?
06-14-2011 01:48 PM
Re: Wild Cards

sela??? my god why why!! what a waste. why the seven wc it's not awarded?
06-13-2011 12:27 AM
Re: Wild Cards

I feel like Kubot should have received one.

06-12-2011 07:18 PM
Re: Wild Cards

Koubek was also asking for a (q) WC.
06-12-2011 06:23 PM
Sombrerero loco
Re: Qualifying Entry List (updated June 12, 2011)

Finally fucsovic was given a wc!! Do we know at what time will be out the oop for tomorrow?
06-12-2011 04:06 PM
Re: Wild Cards

Originally Posted by 156mphserve View Post
I'm rather dissapointed in Wimbledon, I thought last years junior winner always got one regardless

I'm not even a Fucovics(or however you spell it) fan, I just think he earned one
Agreed, well I guess they just decided against what they have been doing for years and years
06-12-2011 04:05 PM
Re: Wild Cards

is getting a qualifying wild card completely out of the question? is everything done now?

because i agree i think he should at least get one for that
06-12-2011 04:00 PM
Re: Wild Cards

I'm rather dissapointed in Wimbledon, I thought last years junior winner always got one regardless

I'm not even a Fucovics(or however you spell it) fan, I just think he earned one
06-12-2011 02:31 PM
Re: Wild Cards

WTF Sela? Angry Tomic didnt get one. But really hope going through quallies will do him good.
06-12-2011 11:57 AM
Re: Wild Cards

about gilles and sabine getting wild cards
06-12-2011 11:55 AM
Chase Visa
Re: Wild Cards

Sela and Muller actually deserve one given they won grass Challengers.

Slightly disappointed Tomic didn't get one, but it'll serve him good by going through qualifying.
This thread has more than 15 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome