Patrick McEnroe & Other Experts Predict Roddick Wins OZ Open [Archive] - MensTennisForums.com

Patrick McEnroe & Other Experts Predict Roddick Wins OZ Open

gogogirl
01-11-2007, 11:00 PM
All,

Can't wait to the draw comes out. Let the betting begin.



Experts agree: Watch for Roddick in 2007By ESPN.com


The year's first Grand Slam event, the Australian Open, is the unofficial kickoff to the 2007 season. Will Roger Federer's dominance continue? Can anyone beat Rafael Nadal on clay? And will we see the Williams sisters win another tournament?

ESPN analysts Patrick McEnroe and Pam Shriver and TENNIS.com's Peter Bodo answer those questions and more about the 2007 season.


Question: Which men's player not named Roger Federer or Rafael Nadal will be the next to win a Grand Slam, and which Grand Slam will it be?


Patrick McEnroe: You heard it here first … Andy Roddick will win the second major of his career. No, not at Wimbledon, but at the Australian Open, and in doing so, will make the tennis season real interesting. I love the way he turned the corner in the second half of 2006, and having Jimmy Connors in his corner has helped big-time. Andy had Federer on the ropes in Shanghai; it was the first time he outplayed Federer for a couple of sets (although it's considerably more difficult to beat Federer in a best of five). I like his physical fitness, and he has the strength to go deep in a tournament like the Australian. Getting to the U.S. Open final was a big boost for his confidence.



Ann Heisenfelt/AP Photo
Our experts agree: Andy Roddick will be the next player not named Federer or Nadal to win a Grand Slam title.
Pam Shriver: I think Andy Roddick will be next to win a major other than Fed and Rafa. It will not be at the Australian or the French, but the U.S. Open. It is hard to imagine many other men winning majors right now, but tennis always has a surprise around the corner.


Peter Bodo: Andy Roddick will win the Australian Open. He finished 2006 on an incredible high and has continued his successful partnership with Jimmy Connors. The Australian surface will be faster this year, and this is a tournament that has thrown up a fair number of big-player upsets in years past.


Q: Who is the player with the best chance to end Rafael Nadal's 62-match clay court win streak?


McEnroe: I'm going out on a limb on this one. It's going to be Nicolas Almagro, another young Spaniard, and it will happen in the early rounds at one of the smaller clay-court tournaments, like Valencia or Barcelona. Almagro is a big hitter off both sides; he is the type of player who can give Nadal trouble. But will it happen at the French? Uhhh … No!


Shriver: Any number of players can beat Rafa on clay -- so many call clay "their" surface -- but I still think Federer will do it. He should have beaten him in Rome last year and is extremely hungry to win his first French.


Bodo: Roger Federer is the safe pick, but let's not forget that Richard Gasquet (sometimes referred to as "Baby Federer") is explosive and versatile. On a great day, he could pound winners and confuse Nadal in a way that a mere grinder cannot.


Q: Amelie Mauresmo, Kim Clijsters, Maria Sharapova and Justine Henin-Hardenne were the four names you saw in the Grand Slam semifinals in 2006. Which women's player wins her first Grand Slam in 2007?


McEnroe: I don't think anyone, to be perfectly honest, because the players at the top are too strong. Sharapova got over a mental hurdle last year by winning her second major. You have good young players like Jelena Jankovic, Nicole Vaidisova and Anna Chakvetadze, but I would be shocked if anyone else wins a major other than those four. Nadia Petrova has the best chance, but I just don't see it happening.


Shriver: Hingis has a better chance to win her sixth major (and first since the 1999 Australian Open) than any first-timer. I suppose another Russian could come out of nowhere like three years ago, but too many of the top women have won majors now.


Bodo: Watch out for Nicole Vaidisova on hard courts. She tailed off after her great French Open last year, but she has all the tools.


Q: The highest ranked American men's player after James Blake and Andy Roddick is Mardy Fish (No. 45). If healthy, does he crack the Top 20?

McEnroe: No, but I do think he will finish ranked between 20 and 30, provided he stays healthy.


Shriver: If Mardy has a big year at the majors then, of course, he can climb into the top 20; however, it's a crap shoot if he can stay healthy and get the good draws. If you had to bet, you would say no Top 20 for Fish this year.


Bodo: Yes, he's got the kind of unpredictable and unconventional (by today's standard) game that can give people fits. He mostly needs to get in the groove, get a little momentum going over the course of a few weeks to become solid Top 20 guy.


Q: Whose the next American (male and female) to win a Grand Slam event?


McEnroe: For the men, Roddick. Don't forget James Blake, who loves the hard courts of Australia and Flushing Meadows. It's tough times of late for the women, and that will continue this year. Lindsay Davenport is on her way to motherhood (congrats, Lindsay), Jennifer Capriati is not coming back and you don't know about the Williams sisters. The problem is the women don't have much coming up; that's not to say the men's side is loaded, but the potential is there for several youngsters to make a move into the big leagues, particularly Californian Sam Querrey.


Shriver: I feel that a Williams sister will win a major again, but not sure if they will do it before Roddick takes the U.S. Open. Maybe we'll see a Serena Williams-Roddick U.S. Open double.


Bodo: See above -- Andy Roddick, Australian Open. For the women, I am going to say Venus Williams because she's the most likely candidate, if the best-case scenario comes to pass: Her wrist heals up and she gets a few matches under her belt in time to challenge at the tournament where she has such a great history, Wimbledon.


Q: The one woman who has the best chance to separate herself from the rest of the field is …


McEnroe: I think Maria Sharapova has a great chance to finish No. 1. It will be very close at the top, but Maria has the best chance to distance herself because she plays more events, and usually is healthier than the other top players throughout the year. Justine Henin-Hardenne always plays a limited schedule (and after pulling out of the Australian Open that will hurt her chances) and Amelie Mauresmo is nicked up here and there. Sharapova is already near the top spot right now (ranked No. 2 behind Henin-Hardenne) and a good run Down Under will propel her to the top spot. Also, she's very consistent (she reached the semis in all but two tournaments in 2006) and fights for every match. Sharapova has the best chance, but I do not see any player running away with the No. 1 ranking. There is no Roger Federer in the women's game right now. The top is considerably more crowded.



AP Photo/Jasper Juinen
Will Maria Sharapova run away with the No. 1 ranking in 2007?
Shriver: Sharapova or Henin-Hardenne, but with news that Henin-Hardenne is out of the Australian, I will go with Sharapova. She has a big game … and bigger heart.


Bodo: Justine Henin-Hardenne, if she stays healthy. (I do expect her to bounce back after her withdrawal from the Australian Open.) Mauresmo isn't prone to choking like she once was, but she remains erratic and unpredictable. She apparently doesn't have the staying power to put real distance between herself and the rest, while Henin-Hardenne seems to be able to play her best tennis and keep her focus regardless of what anyone else is -- or isn't -- doing.


Q: Kim Clijsters will retire after the 2007 season.


McEnroe: No. I just think she likes to play. She can start the rest of her life and still play part-time and still be top five in the world. She's still young (23), so she could play a limited schedule and still be competitive.


Shriver: Kim seems committed to retiring at the end of the year. Assuming she and Brian Lynch, are happy and committed. We all know Kim wants kids as soon as possible, and obviously has enough money for several lifetimes; so while retiring in her mid 20s seems soon, it feels right for Kim.


Bodo: No. She's seen enough Elton John and Barbra Streisand "farewell" concerts to know how much they can be milked to create drama and generate PR.


Q: This time next year, what will be saying about the seasons Venus and Serena had?


McEnroe: We'll be saying they spent about as much time on red carpet as they did at Grand Slam events. Venus wants to play more, but she's injured quite a bit. As for Serena, I don't think she has the desire.


Shriver: This is a make-or-break year for both sisters, especially Serena, who has not done squat since the 2005 Australian. Talent is always there, but how are their levels of desire? Tennis would be better off to have them both in the mix for another year or two … or four.


Bodo: Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.

http://sports.espn.go.com/sports/tennis/aus07/columns/story?id=2717737

Andre'sNo1Fan
01-11-2007, 11:03 PM
Patrick McEnroe thinks his favourite son is gonna win the Oz Open :lol: No surprise there then....

Black Adam
01-11-2007, 11:04 PM
I agree that Almagro can end the Streak but not in FO.

scarecrows
01-11-2007, 11:05 PM
P Mac has said that in every tournament Roddick has played

cmurray
01-11-2007, 11:09 PM
I like Andy just fine, but doesn't Patrick McEnroe ALWAYS say that? :rolleyes:

I guess I wouldn't mind seeing Andy win another slam, but at the same time, I don't think Melbourne is the place it's going to happen. I'd put a handful of other guys as favored over Andy...but American journalists have to pick an American. Sigh.

Kalliopeia
01-11-2007, 11:09 PM
Patrick McEnroe thinks Roddick will win? :eek::eek::eek:

:rolls:

Hands up, who is surprised?

scoobs
01-11-2007, 11:12 PM
I see the air is still thin up there on Planet American Tennis.

Loremaster
01-11-2007, 11:25 PM
:rolleyes: :haha:
PMac has obession :devil:

tangerine_dream
01-11-2007, 11:26 PM
Oh goody. A curse. Exactly what Roddick needs.

:ras:

Rogiman
01-11-2007, 11:30 PM
Roddick is definitely one of the favourites, probably 2nd after Federer.

richie21
01-11-2007, 11:30 PM
reading P.MacEnroe's comments, you would almost believe that A.Roddick is the best player in the world :o

RickDaStick
01-11-2007, 11:32 PM
Usa,usa,usa,usa

guga2120
01-11-2007, 11:49 PM
PMac is always up Roddicks ass, but besides Federer he is the 2nd favorite. But he can not beat Federer so it won't matter.

sykotique
01-11-2007, 11:54 PM
Well, c'mon, we know that P. Mac has a hard-on for Roddick, but who else is he going to pick?

Nadal, who's going through a bad slump and hasn't done much on hardcourt in a long time? Mr. Invisible Davydenko? Ljubicic has a chance to go deep, but he's one of the players in the top 10 least likely to defeat Federer. Blake, who hardly knows what the 2nd week of a Grand Slam looks like outside of the US? Ancic, who only flatters to deceive? Nalbandian, injured and out of form, Hewitt and Safin, past their better years.


I mean, conventional wisdom (and all the bookies for that matter) says that Federer wins this one in a trot, but basically speaking, if you pick anyone besides Federer to win a Grand Slam, you're going to run into a lot of raised eyebrows. So you might as well throw the names in a hat and pick one.

RonE
01-11-2007, 11:55 PM
Where can I find that "jerking off" smiley?

Shabazza
01-11-2007, 11:57 PM
I would have been suprised to here another pick from PMac. It's good that some things never change. :cool:

scarecrows
01-11-2007, 11:59 PM
Where can I find that "jerking off" smiley?

there you go

http://img2.menstennisforums.com/500/thumbs/jerkit.gif

DrJules
01-12-2007, 12:03 AM
Roddick is probably second favourite after Federer so he has a good chance to win the event. Rafael Nadal has not impressed since last Wimbledon around 7 months ago.

KaxMisha
01-12-2007, 12:09 AM
All,

Can't wait to the draw comes out. Let the betting begin.



Experts agree: Watch for Roddick in 2007By ESPN.com


The year's first Grand Slam event, the Australian Open, is the unofficial kickoff to the 2007 season. Will Roger Federer's dominance continue? Can anyone beat Rafael Nadal on clay? And will we see the Williams sisters win another tournament?

ESPN analysts Patrick McEnroe and Pam Shriver and TENNIS.com's Peter Bodo answer those questions and more about the 2007 season.


Question: Which men's player not named Roger Federer or Rafael Nadal will be the next to win a Grand Slam, and which Grand Slam will it be?


Patrick McEnroe: You heard it here first … Andy Roddick will win the second major of his career. No, not at Wimbledon, but at the Australian Open, and in doing so, will make the tennis season real interesting. I love the way he turned the corner in the second half of 2006, and having Jimmy Connors in his corner has helped big-time. Andy had Federer on the ropes in Shanghai; it was the first time he outplayed Federer for a couple of sets (although it's considerably more difficult to beat Federer in a best of five). I like his physical fitness, and he has the strength to go deep in a tournament like the Australian. Getting to the U.S. Open final was a big boost for his confidence.



Ann Heisenfelt/AP Photo
Our experts agree: Andy Roddick will be the next player not named Federer or Nadal to win a Grand Slam title.
Pam Shriver: I think Andy Roddick will be next to win a major other than Fed and Rafa. It will not be at the Australian or the French, but the U.S. Open. It is hard to imagine many other men winning majors right now, but tennis always has a surprise around the corner.


Peter Bodo: Andy Roddick will win the Australian Open. He finished 2006 on an incredible high and has continued his successful partnership with Jimmy Connors. The Australian surface will be faster this year, and this is a tournament that has thrown up a fair number of big-player upsets in years past.


Q: Who is the player with the best chance to end Rafael Nadal's 62-match clay court win streak?


McEnroe: I'm going out on a limb on this one. It's going to be Nicolas Almagro, another young Spaniard, and it will happen in the early rounds at one of the smaller clay-court tournaments, like Valencia or Barcelona. Almagro is a big hitter off both sides; he is the type of player who can give Nadal trouble. But will it happen at the French? Uhhh … No!


Shriver: Any number of players can beat Rafa on clay -- so many call clay "their" surface -- but I still think Federer will do it. He should have beaten him in Rome last year and is extremely hungry to win his first French.


Bodo: Roger Federer is the safe pick, but let's not forget that Richard Gasquet (sometimes referred to as "Baby Federer") is explosive and versatile. On a great day, he could pound winners and confuse Nadal in a way that a mere grinder cannot.


Q: Amelie Mauresmo, Kim Clijsters, Maria Sharapova and Justine Henin-Hardenne were the four names you saw in the Grand Slam semifinals in 2006. Which women's player wins her first Grand Slam in 2007?


McEnroe: I don't think anyone, to be perfectly honest, because the players at the top are too strong. Sharapova got over a mental hurdle last year by winning her second major. You have good young players like Jelena Jankovic, Nicole Vaidisova and Anna Chakvetadze, but I would be shocked if anyone else wins a major other than those four. Nadia Petrova has the best chance, but I just don't see it happening.


Shriver: Hingis has a better chance to win her sixth major (and first since the 1999 Australian Open) than any first-timer. I suppose another Russian could come out of nowhere like three years ago, but too many of the top women have won majors now.


Bodo: Watch out for Nicole Vaidisova on hard courts. She tailed off after her great French Open last year, but she has all the tools.


Q: The highest ranked American men's player after James Blake and Andy Roddick is Mardy Fish (No. 45). If healthy, does he crack the Top 20?

McEnroe: No, but I do think he will finish ranked between 20 and 30, provided he stays healthy.


Shriver: If Mardy has a big year at the majors then, of course, he can climb into the top 20; however, it's a crap shoot if he can stay healthy and get the good draws. If you had to bet, you would say no Top 20 for Fish this year.


Bodo: Yes, he's got the kind of unpredictable and unconventional (by today's standard) game that can give people fits. He mostly needs to get in the groove, get a little momentum going over the course of a few weeks to become solid Top 20 guy.


Q: Whose the next American (male and female) to win a Grand Slam event?


McEnroe: For the men, Roddick. Don't forget James Blake, who loves the hard courts of Australia and Flushing Meadows. It's tough times of late for the women, and that will continue this year. Lindsay Davenport is on her way to motherhood (congrats, Lindsay), Jennifer Capriati is not coming back and you don't know about the Williams sisters. The problem is the women don't have much coming up; that's not to say the men's side is loaded, but the potential is there for several youngsters to make a move into the big leagues, particularly Californian Sam Querrey.


Shriver: I feel that a Williams sister will win a major again, but not sure if they will do it before Roddick takes the U.S. Open. Maybe we'll see a Serena Williams-Roddick U.S. Open double.


Bodo: See above -- Andy Roddick, Australian Open. For the women, I am going to say Venus Williams because she's the most likely candidate, if the best-case scenario comes to pass: Her wrist heals up and she gets a few matches under her belt in time to challenge at the tournament where she has such a great history, Wimbledon.


Q: The one woman who has the best chance to separate herself from the rest of the field is …


McEnroe: I think Maria Sharapova has a great chance to finish No. 1. It will be very close at the top, but Maria has the best chance to distance herself because she plays more events, and usually is healthier than the other top players throughout the year. Justine Henin-Hardenne always plays a limited schedule (and after pulling out of the Australian Open that will hurt her chances) and Amelie Mauresmo is nicked up here and there. Sharapova is already near the top spot right now (ranked No. 2 behind Henin-Hardenne) and a good run Down Under will propel her to the top spot. Also, she's very consistent (she reached the semis in all but two tournaments in 2006) and fights for every match. Sharapova has the best chance, but I do not see any player running away with the No. 1 ranking. There is no Roger Federer in the women's game right now. The top is considerably more crowded.



AP Photo/Jasper Juinen
Will Maria Sharapova run away with the No. 1 ranking in 2007?
Shriver: Sharapova or Henin-Hardenne, but with news that Henin-Hardenne is out of the Australian, I will go with Sharapova. She has a big game … and bigger heart.


Bodo: Justine Henin-Hardenne, if she stays healthy. (I do expect her to bounce back after her withdrawal from the Australian Open.) Mauresmo isn't prone to choking like she once was, but she remains erratic and unpredictable. She apparently doesn't have the staying power to put real distance between herself and the rest, while Henin-Hardenne seems to be able to play her best tennis and keep her focus regardless of what anyone else is -- or isn't -- doing.


Q: Kim Clijsters will retire after the 2007 season.


McEnroe: No. I just think she likes to play. She can start the rest of her life and still play part-time and still be top five in the world. She's still young (23), so she could play a limited schedule and still be competitive.


Shriver: Kim seems committed to retiring at the end of the year. Assuming she and Brian Lynch, are happy and committed. We all know Kim wants kids as soon as possible, and obviously has enough money for several lifetimes; so while retiring in her mid 20s seems soon, it feels right for Kim.


Bodo: No. She's seen enough Elton John and Barbra Streisand "farewell" concerts to know how much they can be milked to create drama and generate PR.


Q: This time next year, what will be saying about the seasons Venus and Serena had?


McEnroe: We'll be saying they spent about as much time on red carpet as they did at Grand Slam events. Venus wants to play more, but she's injured quite a bit. As for Serena, I don't think she has the desire.


Shriver: This is a make-or-break year for both sisters, especially Serena, who has not done squat since the 2005 Australian. Talent is always there, but how are their levels of desire? Tennis would be better off to have them both in the mix for another year or two … or four.


Bodo: Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.

http://sports.espn.go.com/sports/tennis/aus07/columns/story?id=2717737

It's not often you find this much bullshit gathered in one place, so if that was the intention - great work! :yeah:

sykotique
01-12-2007, 12:11 AM
Roddick is probably second favourite after Federer so he has a good chance to win the event. Rafael Nadal has not impressed since last Wimbledon around 7 months ago.

The obvious, and most likely, is Federer. It would be a surprise to no one, including McEnroe, if he won his 10th Grand Slam.


But Roddick definitely fits the criteria as a contender.


He's won a Grand Slam on hardcourt. He's made the semifinals of the Australian Open before. Judging from last year and the beginning of this one, he's in form and not nursing any strains or niggling injuries. He's in the top 10.


Not many other players fit that criteria.

alexa18
01-12-2007, 12:25 AM
Sorry but I don't think the duck has a chance in hell :p :o :ignore:

NYCtennisfan
01-12-2007, 12:40 AM
As of right not with all the injuries and probably even without the injuries, Roddick is the favorite after Federer.

R.Federer
01-12-2007, 12:43 AM
Hey, I predictedandy to win his 2nd major this year 2-3 months ago, I can unearth my post if needed
I don't think AO but maybe u.so

bluefork
01-12-2007, 12:45 AM
As of right not with all the injuries and probably even without the injuries, Roddick is the favorite after Federer.

True. But he does have a pretty tough draw. And despite his results as of late, I'm reluctant to ever count Nadal out. I have a bad feeling he's about ready to pull himself together again.

And :rolleyes: at PMac. He loses a lot of credibility when he picks Roddick to win pretty much every tournament.

El Legenda
01-12-2007, 12:46 AM
http://img2.menstennisforums.com/500/thumbs/jerkit.gif

*Viva Chile*
01-12-2007, 01:13 AM
What a "surprising" comment coming from PMac :rolleyes: :p

Allstar
01-12-2007, 01:15 AM
'experts' :)

MissPovaFan
01-12-2007, 01:18 AM
hmmmm surely Roddick has very little chance :o

nobama
01-12-2007, 01:39 AM
Boy they dumped Nadal in a hurry. :lol: What happed to the 'slow, high bouncing' rebound ace courts favoring Nadal? I remember last year they were all pimping Roddick as he cruised in his early rounds. I expect the same will happen this year until/if he runs in to Safin.

Regenbogen
01-12-2007, 01:44 AM
I don't really think Roddick will make it very far :shrug:

Jimnik
01-12-2007, 01:58 AM
Unless they really sped up the courts, I don't see him getting past Safin.

rofe
01-12-2007, 02:44 AM
Boy they dumped Nadal in a hurry. :lol: What happed to the 'slow, high bouncing' rebound ace courts favoring Nadal? I remember last year they were all pimping Roddick as he cruised in his early rounds. I expect the same will happen this year until/if he runs in to Safin.

I think Gilbert was all over Nadal last year going so far as to say that Fed would have lost if Nadal had played.

nobama
01-12-2007, 03:10 AM
I think Gilbert was all over Nadal last year going so far as to say that Fed would have lost if Nadal had played.PMac said the same thing, that had Nadal played he would've beaten Federer.

Fedex
01-12-2007, 04:32 AM
:lol: :rolls:

Gasquet&Feli_Fan
01-12-2007, 05:00 AM
who how surprising that Pat thinks Roddick will win :lol:

switz
01-12-2007, 06:00 AM
Roddick is playing well and we'll probably beat Federer at the exo but when it comes to the crunch i don't see him getting over Roger. He had a great US hardcourt season but his year end wasn't that amazing and he didn't "outplay" Roger for two sets he just played better than him and then Federer stepped it up and cruised in the third and Roddick crashed out of the tournament.

Almagro isn't exactly the player i'd be picking to beat Nadal either.

We shall see.

pistolmarat
01-12-2007, 10:37 AM
well, now ARod won't get past the 4th round:lol:

RonE
01-12-2007, 12:02 PM
there you go

http://img2.menstennisforums.com/500/thumbs/jerkit.gif

Thanks Genci :hatoff:

To PMac: http://img2.menstennisforums.com/500/thumbs/jerkit.gif

partygirl
01-12-2007, 12:06 PM
Oh goody. A curse. Exactly what Roddick needs.

:ras:
An Irish curse;):lol::tape:

TheBoiledEgg
01-12-2007, 12:30 PM
Cant see Rubber Ducky making it to the 2nd week
even then he'll be lucky to win more than 3-4 games per set of Roger.

Blue Heart24
01-12-2007, 01:26 PM
:haha: :retard:

Miss Croft
01-12-2007, 01:39 PM
oh yeah wow :D

Byrd
01-12-2007, 01:43 PM
Nadal probably would've beaten Fed at AUS 2006 since he had the mental edge over him and everything, you saw what happened when they played for the first time in dubai, and feds backhand and form in AUS 2006 was really crap, and this is coming from a fed fan.

DwyaneWade
01-12-2007, 03:35 PM
Nadal probably would've beaten Fed at AUS 2006 since he had the mental edge over him and everything, you saw what happened when they played for the first time in dubai, and feds backhand and form in AUS 2006 was really crap, and this is coming from a fed fan.

no need for speculation. What's done is done. Federer is the AO 2006 champion and that is all that matters.

As for Pmac, he is going out on a limb and trying to make surprising picks, that if true, will make him look like a genius. No one would remember if he picked Fed and Fed won. People will remember if Roddick (the 2nd favorite) wins. Just like people will remember if Almagro happens to beat Nadal.

Fumus
01-12-2007, 04:05 PM
P Mac has said that in every tournament Roddick has played

:worship: :worship: :worship:

RickDaStick
01-12-2007, 04:06 PM
I think PMAC has said Roddick will have a breakthrough Rolland Garros every year the past 4 years. That has yet to happen but im sure this will be the year, right Patrick?

RickDaStick
01-12-2007, 04:12 PM
From tennis-x

ESPN’s Patrick McEnroe: “You heard it here first…Andy Roddick will win the second major of his career. No, not at Wimbledon, but at the Australian Open, and in doing so, will make the tennis season real interesting. I love the way he turned the corner in the second half of 2006, and having Jimmy Connors in his corner has helped big-time.” And from Peter Bodo on ESPN.com: “Andy Roddick will win the Australian Open. He finished 2006 on an incredible high and has continued his successful partnership with Jimmy Connors. The Australian surface will be faster this year, and this is a tournament that has thrown up a fair number of big-player upsets in years past.” And from Richard Vach, not on ESPN: “Uhh, what are you guys smoking?

:)

Fumus
01-12-2007, 04:18 PM
From tennis-x

ESPN’s Patrick McEnroe: “You heard it here first…Andy Roddick will win the second major of his career. No, not at Wimbledon, but at the Australian Open, and in doing so, will make the tennis season real interesting. I love the way he turned the corner in the second half of 2006, and having Jimmy Connors in his corner has helped big-time.” And from Peter Bodo on ESPN.com: “Andy Roddick will win the Australian Open. He finished 2006 on an incredible high and has continued his successful partnership with Jimmy Connors. The Australian surface will be faster this year, and this is a tournament that has thrown up a fair number of big-player upsets in years past.” And from Richard Vach, not on ESPN: “Uhh, what are you guys smoking?

:)

Vach is a hack, he's smoking stuff alot too. All of those tennis-x people are opinionated bastards. After Federer and Nadal, I mean imagine the two just poof disapear, who else would you pick to win AO??!? Ivan...I think not, he's never even made a gs final. Roddick is the next logical choice, his resume has alot more on it than, more anyone else in the top 10 (minus fed, Nadal). He may not be the most talented...but he's a proven horse.

rofe
01-12-2007, 04:24 PM
Andy has a good chance. He is confident (and confidence should never be underestimated), his volleys have improved and his forehand seems to have found a bit of a groove. I do think Andy can go deep in this AO.

Fumus
01-12-2007, 04:32 PM
Yea, I mean I am not sucking Andy's dick here total fangirling style or anything but just being logical, he's coming into this event with most credentials behind Federer and Nadal, and he's historically done well here, he's made the second week at AO since 02 when he retired to Ivan and he made the final of the last GS. It's not a stretch to pick him as going to the final behind Federer, I am not saying he can beat Fed or start any of that, I am just saying if you eliminate 1 and 2, he's the number 3 with the exp and results.

Billabong
01-12-2007, 05:33 PM
He always says that, no surprise here:rolleyes: He will probably say the same thing in Roland Garros;)

RickDaStick
01-12-2007, 05:40 PM
Lets not take PMAC too seriously when it comes to Roddick. This guy was in tears when Ivan beat Andy to clinch the Davis Cup tie a few years back.

jazar
01-12-2007, 06:28 PM
he'll do well, but he definitely won't win

Rogiman
01-12-2007, 06:32 PM
I am not saying he can beat Fed or start any of that, I am just saying if you eliminate 1 and 2, he's the number 3 with the exp and results.And he has a much better chance to win it than #2.

DwyaneWade
01-12-2007, 06:40 PM
And he has a much better chance to win it than #2.

ummm....not based on the draw...maybe based on form.

Fumus
01-12-2007, 06:46 PM
ummm....not based on the draw...maybe based on form.

douche. If you looked at the draw you would see Nadal plays Blake or Berdych, I would say he's got about as good of a chance beating them as Roddick does Fed. They are horrible matchups with horrible records for both...n e ways....yea Roddick probably #2 pick for AO this year.

DwyaneWade
01-13-2007, 01:23 AM
I seriously doubt Berdych will be there and as for Blake that's one bad matchup in a whole half.
On the other hand Roddick has it tough 3rd through SF