King Kunitsyn rolls over Tommy Haas-been 7-6 4-6 6-2 [Archive] - MensTennisForums.com

King Kunitsyn rolls over Tommy Haas-been 7-6 4-6 6-2

its.like.that
10-26-2006, 05:17 PM
Igor served 2 aces, 0 double faults, and most importantly, went 5/5 on break points.

Tommy served 13 aces to 9 double faults, and went 4/6 on break points.

Action Jackson
10-26-2006, 05:18 PM
Hope he can play Ancic in the final, then Igor has a huge chance of winning.

If he wins it will St Kunitsynsburg.

NeverSayDie
10-26-2006, 05:19 PM
Haas :sad: Igor :yeah:

TheBoiledEgg
10-26-2006, 05:20 PM
Igor should play Davis Cup final by himself

he'd win the doubles even :lol:

Yappa
10-26-2006, 05:21 PM
Expected loss with the expected score in the 3rd set.
But 9 DFs Haas? WTF?!

ReturnWinner
10-26-2006, 05:23 PM
he is too good, all players are shit compared to him :worship:

Scotso
10-26-2006, 05:27 PM
Igor :banana:

its.like.that
10-26-2006, 05:31 PM
Igor now faces Starace for a place in the semi-finals.

Would be quite ironic if he lost.

:lol:

federated
10-26-2006, 05:33 PM
WHTH? What Happened to Haas?

scarecrows
10-26-2006, 05:34 PM
Igor now faces Starace for a place in the semi-finals.

Would be quite ironic if he lost.

:lol:

the amount of luck that has revolved Starace in StPet is scary, so you never know

Ernham
10-26-2006, 05:37 PM
Tommy served 13 aces to 9 double faults..

Really? Stats don't sound at all like Tommy.

its.like.that
10-26-2006, 05:47 PM
Really? Stats don't sound at all like Tommy.

Yes, really.

Ernham
10-26-2006, 05:54 PM
Yes, really.

Really, really?

its.like.that
10-26-2006, 06:22 PM
Really, really?

Forever-ever and ever-ever...

Fergie
10-26-2006, 09:06 PM
Awesome result Igor! :bounce:

mr_burns
10-26-2006, 10:13 PM
tommy, it's just a shame...The Davis Cup killed U...So no Shanghai, again no TMC

atheneglaukopis
10-26-2006, 10:16 PM
Wow...what is wrong with Haas now?

musefanatic
10-26-2006, 11:33 PM
My god, that's a shocker!!! :eek:

its.like.that
10-27-2006, 12:47 AM
People, get a grip on reality here. :rolleyes:

Tommy actually played quite well, but he was simply no match for Igor.

There is nothing wrong with Tommy.

jole
10-27-2006, 02:31 AM
Igorrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr@#q&*$(@# Heeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

Lleyton, Marat
10-27-2006, 02:39 AM
Terrible loss Tommy! :rolleyes:

hanabishi
10-27-2006, 03:11 AM
Thank you Igor for earning me more Vcash.

atheneglaukopis
10-27-2006, 03:21 AM
People, get a grip on reality here. :rolleyes:

Tommy actually played quite well, but he was simply no match for Igor.

There is nothing wrong with Tommy.Tommy's 3-4 since the US Open, at a time when he should be fighting for a TMC spot, which is why I asked.

ufokart
10-27-2006, 03:24 AM
That's great Igor :woohoo:

Keep it up :yeah:

its.like.that
10-27-2006, 03:27 AM
Tommy's 3-4 since the US Open, at a time when he should be fighting for a TMC spot, which is why I asked.

Read the thread title.

Kunitsyn = King

MariaV
10-27-2006, 07:56 AM
That was a pathetic choke job from Haas. Serving for the 1st set. :rolleyes:
And the 3rd set was simply pathetic.

Action Jackson
10-27-2006, 07:58 AM
Tommy's 3-4 since the US Open, at a time when he should be fighting for a TMC spot, which is why I asked.

Ever thought Haas just isn't that good?

leng jai
10-27-2006, 08:06 AM
Ever thought Haas just isn't that good?

No

Action Jackson
10-27-2006, 08:08 AM
No

You still think he will win the Grand Slam without losing a set, so I wouldn't expect anything else from you.

leng jai
10-27-2006, 08:26 AM
I never said that. But it would be nice.

Action Jackson
10-27-2006, 08:27 AM
I never said that. But it would be nice.

Not my fault you overrate the guy.

leng jai
10-27-2006, 08:37 AM
Yeah maybe I do sometimes, but thats the point of being a fan. Not my fault he has no brain and can't win consistently.

Action Jackson
10-27-2006, 08:38 AM
Not sometimes, you do it all the time.

leng jai
10-27-2006, 08:43 AM
So you obviously don't agree hes one of the most talented players on tour who has achieved nowhere near his potential.

Action Jackson
10-27-2006, 08:45 AM
So you obviously don't agree hes one of the most talented players on tour who has achieved nowhere near his potential.

The worst #2 in the world of all time. He overachieved actually, he was good, but not that good.

Beat
10-27-2006, 10:01 AM
oh yeah!

chunchojuan
10-27-2006, 10:40 AM
Go KING IGOR!!!

:worship: :worship: :worship:

Ernham
10-27-2006, 10:46 AM
The worst #2 in the world of all time. He overachieved actually, he was good, but not that good.

Not talent-wise. Other than Gasquet, I'm not sure there are many other players that have the total package he does. All Haas is missing is drive and focus, two things he seems to lack a lot of.

Minotaur
10-27-2006, 10:52 AM
People, get a grip on reality here. :rolleyes:

Tommy actually played quite well, but he was simply no match for Igor.

There is nothing wrong with Tommy.


Have you watched the matched?

Tommy couldn't move properly (cause he was injured), made more than 60 ues. Igor played ok but it was Haas who lost the match.

its.like.that
10-27-2006, 12:33 PM
Have you watched the matched?

Tommy couldn't move properly (cause he was injured), made more than 60 ues. Igor played ok but it was Haas who lost the match.

Nice excuse.

But that doesn't cut it in the world of professional sport.

The person who is better on the day wins (unless the umpire messes things up).

atheneglaukopis
10-27-2006, 03:24 PM
Ever thought Haas just isn't that good?There were a number of possible answers to my question, of which I was hoping someone who has been able to watch his recent matches would be able to supply the correct answer or combination of answers. One possible answer would indeed be that Haas sucks at this time of year, just as he sucks during the clay season. I would have to check his record in previous years. Another possible answer is there is something physically wrong with him. This happens sometimes to players. Yet another possible answer is that there was something wrong with the mental side. This happens sometimes too.

Finally, there is the possibility that there is in fact nothing wrong with him, technically, physically, or mentally, that he has maintained the same level of play since the US Open, and that he made the quarters there but has hardly been able to win a match since then because that's just how it goes.

---Benny---
10-27-2006, 03:25 PM
Tommy :help:

Action Jackson
10-28-2006, 01:56 PM
Not talent-wise. Other than Gasquet, I'm not sure there are many other players that have the total package he does. All Haas is missing is drive and focus, two things he seems to lack a lot of.

Not the point. Haas was the worst #2, the guy got there and didn't win a tournament in the year he finished that. You can overrate Haas all you want, he had his time and it's gone now.

The way you make him out to be is that he is one of the greatest talents of all time and that is not even close to being true. So he has an excellent backhand, he is not the only player ever to have that.

Ernham
10-28-2006, 03:23 PM
Not the point. Haas was the worst #2,

Well, do me a favor. Why don't you tell me every player that's been ranked at #2 for any period of time. You really expect anyone to believe you could even remember 10% of them, let alone analyze them all comprehensively to come to that conclusion? You are obviously trolling here.

Action Jackson
10-28-2006, 03:48 PM
Well, do me a favor. Why don't you tell me every player that's been ranked at #2 for any period of time. You really expect anyone to believe you could even remember 10% of them, let alone anaylize them all comprehensively to come to that conclusion? You are obviously trolling.

Why don't you get some perspective and stop being a fanboy.

The only guy to reach# 2 was Haas in a year where he didn't win a title. Rios was the only to make #1 without winning a Slam, but hey he won TMS.

The list below from 1975-2006 the players who finished at number 2 and Haas is not up to that level, in 2002 in which me made #2 he finished outside the top 10.


1973: Newcombe, John (AUS)
1974: Newcombe, John (AUS)
1975: Vilas, Guillermo (ARG)
1976: Borg, Björn (SWE)
1977: Vilas, Guillermo (ARG)
1978: Borg, Björn (SWE)
1979: Connors, Jimmy (USA)
1980: McEnroe, John (USA)
1981: Lendl, Ivan (TCH)
1982: Connors, Jimmy (USA)
1983: Lendl, Ivan (TCH)
1984; Connors, Jimmy (USA)
1985: McEnroe, John (USA)
1986: Becker, Boris (GER)
1987: Edberg, Stefan (SWE
1988: Lendl, Ivan (TCH)
1989: Becker, Boris (GER)
1990 Becker, Boris (GER)
1991: Courier, Jim (USA)
1992: Edberg, Stefan (SWE)
1993: Stich, Michael (GER)
1994: Agassi, Andre (USA)
1995: Agassi, Andre (USA)
1996: Chang, Michael
1997: Rafter, Patrick
1998:: Rios, Marcelo
1999: Kafelnikov, Yevgeny
2000: Safin, Marat
2001: Kuerten, Gustavo
2002: Agaasi, Andre (Haas May 2002)
2003: Federer, Roger
2004: Roddick, Andy
2005: Nadal, Rafael
2006: Nadal, Rafael


There you go all from Rios had won at least one Slam and or including multiple TMS titles, something Haas hasn't done. Kafelnikov won 2 Slams and no TMS titles.

In your own words without being fanboy who is Haas better than on that list at any time?

Ernham
10-28-2006, 04:11 PM
These aren't even a fraction of the players that have been ranked at #2. You don't know what the hell you are trolling about.