Did Federer lose on purpose in order to avoid playing Nalbandian? [Archive] - MensTennisForums.com

Did Federer lose on purpose in order to avoid playing Nalbandian?

Love
10-23-2003, 09:47 PM
please vote

TheBoiledEgg
10-23-2003, 09:51 PM
Ivan was too good today
he served amazing today....... 30 aces
and 27 of those in 1st two sets

TennisLurker
10-23-2003, 09:55 PM
Love, why do you hate Federer so much??

Love
10-23-2003, 10:09 PM
I don't hate him... I just like controversy & attention. :angel:

Deboogle!.
10-23-2003, 10:39 PM
And you all say that Andy fans need to get a life? LOL

Love
10-23-2003, 11:35 PM
And you all say that Andy fans need to get a life? LOL

I'm an Andy fan ;)

jtipson
10-23-2003, 11:55 PM
That explains a lot ;-)

croat123
10-23-2003, 11:55 PM
:o

baseline ace
10-24-2003, 12:35 AM
Federer is a competitor. I don't think any competitor loses on purpose. :eek:

heya
10-24-2003, 06:49 AM
LOL!

Doris Loeffel
10-24-2003, 08:11 AM
infront of his homepublic?? You really have no clue - and don't know him at all!!

J. Corwin
10-24-2003, 10:34 AM
Of course not. Roger's too professional to do that.

nitsansh
10-24-2003, 09:38 PM
If he tried to lose, he certainly didn't show it...
You surely didn't see the match if you suggest that!

Ma. Estefania
10-24-2003, 10:57 PM
LOL! You guys really make me laugh hard, ja ja. ;)

Come on....I know he maybe didn't want to face David, but if things were given like that, I'm sure he would have tried hard to beat him......but come on...to lose on purpose? and at home? NO WAY!

Yashirobai
10-25-2003, 03:47 PM
I'm sure he didn't lose on purpose. Professional players, and specially the best ones, the Top 10, never lose on purpose (or they souldn't)