The time hath come for Murray to quit being a wussy [Archive] - MensTennisForums.com

The time hath come for Murray to quit being a wussy

Raiden
09-11-2012, 04:08 PM
... and start asserting himself and taking care of his interest.

And his interest doesn't coincide with his top-four mates Nadal and Djokovic, who are using their leverage to change rules, change the nature of tournaments for advancement of their interest, which is the systematic undermining of fast pace tennis (for examples of that we only have to look at the two players' "blue clay blackmail" and Nadal's earlier successful extermination of carpet tennis (with no opposition from Federer, who complacently agreed with Nadal because at those times Fed was at his peak and wasn't far sighted enough to care about what's good for his later career).

Likewise the decision regarding the schedule whereby the vacation period was extended at the expense of crowding and compressing the year end indoor season (the scandalous act of no less than a Masters 1000 tournament being held the week before the year-end World Tour finals). This is NOT in the interest of Andy Murray. So needless to say it's time for him to quit being a pussy (always agreeing with whatever Nadal and Djoker's opinion is on every issue) and start questioning whether their interest is his. One thing is clear: they're not gonna do it for him - Nadal & Djokovic aren't gonna advance Murray's interest
.

HKz
09-11-2012, 04:20 PM
I doubt it matters. Even if he is a slam champion now, Djokovic certainly garners much more influence and Federer/Nadal have even more than that. Murray is still a small speck.

TigerTim
09-11-2012, 04:28 PM
Murray could easily get the backing of people like Tsonga, Berydch, etc over this and form a reasonably powerful faction

Raiden
09-11-2012, 05:34 PM
Murray could easily get the backing of people like Tsonga, Berydch, etc over this and form a reasonably powerful factionExactly.

But it takes character and personality to do that - I'm not sure Murray have that. I think he's a pussy - he's afraid to have a disagreement.

Raiden
09-12-2012, 03:31 AM
... Djokovic certainly garners much more influence and Federer/Nadal have even more than that. Murray is still a small speck.Seems that that is largly by choice - his choice.

Topspindoctor
09-12-2012, 03:38 AM
Just because Mandy won a slam, won't mean the organizers will now listen and bend down to his whims. The big 3 still rule this sport, time to accept it :wavey:

Mark Lenders
09-12-2012, 03:44 AM
Murray's interest is exactly the same as Nadal and Djokovic's here. Every time two of these three face in a hardcourt Slam it's an 'epic' (:superlol:) 5 hour+ pushathon/grindathon. If Murray has any say in it, hardcourts will only become even slower as to further neutralize any sort of aggressive tennis :zzz:

Topspindoctor
09-12-2012, 04:01 AM
I thought Mandy was a beast on fast surface with his "touch at the net" and "soft hands"..?

BroTree123
09-12-2012, 04:05 AM
Kimmy would disagree.

http://weknowmemes.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/if-you-know-what-i-mean.png

Vladoz
09-12-2012, 04:42 AM
yea he was SO CLOSE to choke away 2-0 set lead, an djokovic cramp saved him

so yea his still a wuss, and will be a wuss

finishingmove
09-12-2012, 08:02 AM
Murray's not an influential character

Raiden
09-12-2012, 04:01 PM
^ Does he want to achieve higher goals or is he satisfied to play second fiddle?

Sham Kay
09-12-2012, 05:06 PM
Murray's happy being who he is, and is the most comfortable of the top 4 in his own skin.

All that matters is that he plays the best tennis, and currently, he is the best tennis player in the world (form-wise). Let Fedal and Djoker have their "influence", pretending to agree to disagree with each other.

Raiden
09-13-2012, 11:39 AM
Murray's happy being who he isAnd that is what?

Extra crew member/bit-player in the "Nole-ra show"?


https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-tSqB1CvRfO0/UFGkPrDtrKI/AAAAAAAAICI/SoEE7V80rfs/s467/djoker-2.gif