Top-10 wins -- Detailed breakdown -- Active players

The lists include all active players who've posted at least one Top-10 win in their career in the following tournaments:
Grand Slams, ATP main tour events (except World Team Championships), now defunct Grand Slam Cup, Davis Cup.

If any player is missing from the lists or there is a glaring error in the data provided, please let me know. Any info/help/correction would be appreciated.

Legends

GS = Grand Slams HO = Hard Outdoors
TF = World Tour Finals CL = Clay courts
MS = Masters Series GR = Grass courts
MM = Other ATP main tour events IN = Indoor Hard/Carpet
DC = Davis Cup

After 2013 Madrid

Player Total GS TF MS MM DC HO CL GR IN

R Federer 162 48 39 49 22 4 68 29 14 51
R Nadal 105 26 9 53 13 4 28 59 8 10
N Djokovic 91 23 14 39 14 1 51 16 4 20
A Murray 64 12 9 27 16 - 40 1 8 15
L Hewitt 58 8 12 12 20 6 24 3 14 17
D Ferrer 43 6 8 17 6 6 9 18 1 15
T Haas 39 4 - 13 19 3 15 7 6 11
N Davydenko 38 6 12 9 8 3 13 6 - 19
D Nalbandian 35 4 6 15 7 3 10 3 2 20
T Berdych 34 6 4 16 5 3 15 6 2 11
JM del Potro 30 4 6 9 9 2 12 5 1 12
JW Tsonga 27 9 4 10 4 - 12 2 3 10
M Youzhny 27 7 - 5 14 1 12 5 3 7
R Soderling 26 4 3 8 11 - 7 7 - 12
M Fish 24 4 - 10 10 - 19 - 3 2
F Lopez 23 3 - 9 9 2 8 5 4 6
R Stepanek 23 1 - 8 13 1 6 6 1 10
G Simon 22 1 1 11 9 - 7 7 - 8
S Wawrinka 22 3 - 13 6 - 10 10 - 2
R Gasquet 21 3 1 13 4 - 11 7 1 2
G Monfils 20 5 - 6 9 - 6 8 1 5


Player Total GS TF MS MM DC HO CL GR IN

M Baghdatis 19 5 - 6 8 - 10 - 2 7
J Blake 19 1 3 4 9 2 9 - 2 8
P Kohlschreiber 18 3 - 3 10 2 7 4 6 1
T Robredo 18 3 1 8 6 - 5 12 - 1
F Verdasco 17 3 - 10 4 - 6 9 1 1
J Monaco 16 - - 7 9 - 2 10 - 4
N Almagro 15 3 - 6 5 1 2 13 - -
X Malisse 15 4 - 5 6 - 8 4 2 1
J Tipsarevic 14 4 1 5 3 1 5 3 2 4
M Cilic 13 4 - 4 5 - 9 1 - 3
I Karlovic 13 4 - 4 5 - 2 3 4 4
O Rochus 13 4 - 4 5 - 7 2 3 1
M Llodra 12 1 - 2 8 1 2 - 1 9
J Melzer 12 1 - 6 5 - 5 4 - 3
I Andreev 11 2 - 2 6 1 2 7 1 1
J Benneteau 11 1 - 4 6 - 4 - - 7
R Ginepri 11 2 - 6 3 - 6 - 1 4
J Isner 11 1 - 3 5 2 7 2 1 1
J Nieminen 11 1 - 3 7 - 3 4 - 4
D Tursunov 11 2 - 1 7 1 4 2 3 2
PH Mathieu 10 - - 2 6 2 4 5 - 1
S Querrey 10 - - 5 5 - 6 1 - 3

Player Total GS TF MS MM DC HO CL GR IN

G Garcia-Lopez 9 1 - 5 3 - 6 2 - 1
E Gulbis 9 3 - 4 2 - 5 2 1 1
F Mayer 9 1 - 4 4 - 3 3 2 1
M Raonic 9 1 - 1 7 - 6 1 - 2
K Nishikori 8 2 - 2 4 - 4 1 1 2
J Chardy 7 2 - 4 - 1 5 2 - -
F Volandri 7 1 - 2 3 1 1 6 - -
B Becker 6 1 - - 5 - 1 - 3 2
G Muller 6 3 - - 3 - 4 - 1 1
A Seppi 6 - - 3 3 - 1 3 - 2
T Bellucci 5 - - 3 2 - - 5 - -
V Hanescu 5 1 - - 4 - - 5 - -
YH Lu 5 1 - - 4 - 2 - 3 -
N Massu 5 - - 2 3 - 2 3 - -
A Montanes 5 - - 2 3 - - 5 - -
F Serra 5 - - 3 2 - 2 2 1 -

Player Total GS TF MS MM DC HO CL GR IN

A Falla 4 3 - 1 - - 2 - 2 -
N Mahut 4 - - - 4 - - - 2 2
P Petzschner 4 - - 1 3 - 1 - 2 1
M Zverev 4 - - 2 2 - 1 2 - 1
K Anderson 3 - - 3 - - 3 - - -
K Beck 3 - - 1 1 1 1 - 1 1
A Bogomolov 3 - - 2 1 - 3 - - -
G Dimitrov 3 - - 3 - - 1 2 - -
I Dodig 3 - - 1 2 - 1 1 1 -
A Dolgopolov 3 1 - 1 1 - 1 2 - -
F Fognini 3 1 - 2 - - - 2 1 -
D Gimeno-Traver 3 - - 2 1 - - 3 - -
A Golubev 3 - - - 2 1 - 1 - 2
M Granollers 3 1 - - 2 - 1 1 - 1
R Ramirez Hidalgo 3 - - - 3 - 1 2 - -
D Sela 3 - - - 2 1 2 - 1 -
V Troicki 3 - - - 3 - 1 1 - 1

Player Total GS TF MS MM DC HO CL GR IN

P Andujar 2 - - 2 - - 2 - - -
M Berrer 2 - - - 2 - 2 - - -
D Brands 2 1 - - 1 - - 1 1 -
F Dancevic 2 1 - - 1 - 1 - 1 -
T de Bakker 2 - - 1 1 - 1 1 - -
T Gabashvili 2 2 - - - - 1 1 - -
M Gicquel 2 - - - 2 - - - 1 1
D Gremelmayr 2 - - - 2 - - 2 - -
R Haase 2 - - 1 1 - 1 - - 1
J Janowicz 2 - - 2 - - - - - 2
T Kamke 2 - - 1 1 - 1 - - 1
E Korolev 2 - - - 2 - 1 - - 1
L Kubot 2 1 - - 1 - 1 - 1 -
O Patience 2 - - - 2 - - 2 - -
L Rosol 2 2 - - - - - 1 1 -
P Starace 2 1 - 1 - - - 2 - -
B Tomic 2 1 - 1 - - 1 - 1 -
A Vinciguerra 2 - - 1 1 - 1 - - 1
D Young 2 - - 1 1 - 1 - - 1

Player Total GS TF MS MM DC HO CL GR IN

B Baker 1 1 - - - - 1 - - -
R Bautista-Agut 1 - - - 1 - 1 - - -
A Beck 1 - - 1 - - - 1 - -
P Capdeville 1 - - - - 1 - - 1 -
S Darcis 1 - - - 1 - - - 1 -
A Delic 1 - - 1 - - 1 - - -
A di Mauro 1 - - - 1 - - 1 - -
M Ebden 1 - - 1 - - 1 - - -
F Gil 1 - - 1 - - - 1 - -
J Hernych 1 - - - 1 - - 1 - -
D Istomin 1 - - 1 - - 1 - - -
M Klizan 1 1 - - - - 1 - - -
F Krajinovic 1 - - - 1 - - 1 - -
M Kukushkin 1 - - - 1 - - - - 1
A Olivetti 1 - - - 1 - - - - 1
B Phau 1 - - - 1 - 1 - - -
S Robert 1 1 - - - - - 1 - -
E Roger-Vasselin 1 - - - 1 - 1 - - -
M Russell 1 - - - 1 - - 1 - -
I Sijsling 1 - - - 1 - - - - 1
H Zeballos 1 - - - 1 - - 1 - -
G Zemlja 1 - - - 1 - - - - 1

AnnaK_4ever 4ever

Great work!

Gasquet has more top 10 Masters Series wins than I would've expected, also Chela is higher than I thought he would be.

:D

Troicki :o

Roddick :o

Always good to see more proof that Ferrer is highly underrated by MTF :hearts:

AnnaK:yeah: great data

In Slams, Hewitt beat only 8 Top 10 players and Roddick only 6 in their long careers. :o

In Slams, Hewitt beat only 8 Top 10 players and Roddick only 6 in their long careers. :o

Tbf Hewitt lost to the eventual winner in 7 slams in a row.

great stats, but I don't get just 1 thing. Why would you exclude World Team Championship?

great stats, but I don't get just 1 thing. Why would you exclude World Team Championship?

Because de facto it's a meaningless exhibition no one takes seriously.

In Slams, Hewitt beat only 8 Top 10 players and Roddick only 6 in their long careers. :o

Tbf Hewitt lost to the eventual winner in 7 slams in a row.


As Andy did simply by losing to Federer 8 times, with the exception of the '09 AO. It undoubtedly skews their results, somewhat, not that that's an excuse.


What impresses me is that two of Roddick's were against Murray and Djokovic of all people, both ranked 3 then. It means much more than beating revolvers like Almagro, Isner and the likes.

Olivetti (over Fish ), Robert (over Berdych ), Krajinovic (over Djokovic) are missing :wavey:

Davydenko 36 is good in spite of plus a half as many choked ones ... :facepalm: otherwise 50+ ... (still ..... 12 TF wins is HUGE .... and i remember 4 more which could've been wins not loses .... Against Nadal in gold group 2006 ... Against Blake in gold group 2006 ... against Djokovic Red group 2008 and again against Djokovic RR stage 2009 ) .......... ALL choked big time :facepalm:
Nalbandian 35 ... these would've been too 50+ if FatDave haven't appeared at the tail end of the matches ....

Because de facto it's a meaningless exhibition no one takes seriously.

:confused: It's a regular ATP 250, just different format. It can give you 250 points just as any other 250. ATP even is an ATP event and should count. They play for points and money... And a TOP10 win is a TOP10 win...

astonished to see that troicki has three wins over top 10 players

What a mug Roddick was

Olivetti (over Fish ), Robert (over Berdych ), Krajinovic (over Djokovic) are missing :wavey:

Thank you! Added.

:confused: It's a regular ATP 250, just different format. It can give you 250 points just as any other 250. ATP even is an ATP event and should count. They play for points and money... And a TOP10 win is a TOP10 win...

No points were awarded at WTC before 2010.

how about adding a winning ratio?

Anna K 4evah's legendary stats threads. :worship:

The 'one-dimensional' and 'overrated' Valencians :worship:

updated after Davis Cup SF.

win #39 for Ferrer, his 5th in DC play.
win #14 for Almagro, his first in DC play.

updated after Tokyo/Beijing.

Massu and Vinciguerra added.

Very good. Clément and Ferrero are now retired though.

Very good. Clément and Ferrero are now retired though.

Yes, but both of them are still ranked ;)

Updated after Bercy. Ferrer scores his 40th win in Paris.

Wow, Ferrer is right among the slam winners.

Would be interesting to see where players stand against the Big Four, the Middle Four and the Bottom Two.

Would be interesting to see where players stand against the Big Four, the Middle Four and the Bottom Two.

There's an existing list of players' records against the Big Four.

Comprising detailed records against the rest would be frivolous since the other positions have been greatly subject to change over the years, and beating them isn't of the same standard as beating one of the big four.

good thread

excellent empirical evidence to show that roddick was a mug who couldn't play tennis

good thread

excellent empirical evidence to show that roddick was a mug who couldn't play tennis

An excellent demonstration of your astounding muggery.

2003:
W/L: 71-18
Wins against Top 10: 5
Losses to Fed: 2
Losses to Other Top 10: 4

2004:
W/L: 74-18
Wins against Top 10: 6
Losses to Fed: 3
Losses to Other Top 10: 3

2005:
W/L: 59-14
Wins against top 10: 2
Losses to Fed: 2
Losses to other Top 10: 2

2006:
W/L: 49-20
Wins against top 10: 1
Losses to Fed: 2
Losses to other Top 10: 2

2007:
W/L: 54-16
Wins against top 10: 5
Losses to Fed: 3
Losses to other Top 10: 4

2008:
W/L: 49-18
Wins against top 10: 4
Losses to Fed: 0
Losses to other Top 10: 6

2009:
WL: 48-15
Wins against top 10: 5
Losses to Fed: 4
Losses to other top 10: 5

2010:
WL: 48-18
Wins against top 10: 4
Losses to Fed: 1
Losses to other top 10: 4

A closer examination of the empirical evidence is actually more revealing. Firstly, Federer owned Roddick, which is no secret. He accounts for the bulk of Roddick's losses. Looking beyond that, you can see that most years, Roddick was fairly consistent in respect to his duels with fellow top ten, even up to 2010, wherein his body really began to fail him. In short, while Roddick didn't beat a lot of top ten players, neither did they disproportionately beat him.

He simply didn't play that many fellow top 10 players other than Fed. In his prime years, considering his outstandingly positive record and consistently strong results, it demonstrates a failure on the part of his rivals to make it to him at important events. He's not responsible for their inconsistency.

Anyway, considering his positive H2H with Djokovic and Nalbandian, your two subjects of that other mug thread, and his split H2H in majors with three of the top four, I'd be careful about saying he can't play tennis.

An excellent demonstration of your astounding muggery.

2003:
W/L: 71-18
Wins against Top 10: 5
Losses to Fed: 2
Losses to Other Top 10: 4

2004:
W/L: 74-18
Wins against Top 10: 6
Losses to Fed: 3
Losses to Other Top 10: 3

2005:
W/L: 59-14
Wins against top 10: 2
Losses to Fed: 2
Losses to other Top 10: 2

2006:
W/L: 49-20
Wins against top 10: 1
Losses to Fed: 2
Losses to other Top 10: 2

2007:
W/L: 54-16
Wins against top 10: 5
Losses to Fed: 3
Losses to other Top 10: 4

2008:
W/L: 49-18
Wins against top 10: 4
Losses to Fed: 0
Losses to other Top 10: 6

2009:
WL: 48-15
Wins against top 10: 5
Losses to Fed: 4
Losses to other top 10: 5

2010:
WL: 48-18
Wins against top 10: 4
Losses to Fed: 1
Losses to other top 10: 4

A closer examination of the empirical evidence is actually more revealing. Firstly, Federer owned Roddick, which is no secret. He accounts for the bulk of Roddick's losses. Looking beyond that, you can see that most years, Roddick was fairly consistent in respect to his duels with fellow top ten, even up to 2010, wherein his body really began to fail him. In short, while Roddick didn't beat a lot of top ten players, neither did they disproportionately beat him.

He simply didn't play that many fellow top 10 players other than Fed. In his prime years, considering his outstandingly positive record and consistently strong results, it demonstrates a failure on the part of his rivals to make it to him at important events. He's not responsible for their inconsistency.

Anyway, considering his positive H2H with Djokovic and Nalbandian, your two subjects of that other mug thread, and his split H2H in majors with three of the top four, I'd be careful about saying he can't play tennis.

kk

Updated after London.

Federer crosses 50 win mark indoors. Djokovic ties Nalbandian for 2nd most wins indoors.

updated after DC final.

David Ferrer ties Lleyton Hewitt for most Davis Cup Top-10 wins.

Updated.
Several players removed from the list due to retirement.

Nadal crossed 100-win mark defeating Ferrer in South America earlier this year. Del Potro reached 30-win mark. Tursunov joined the ones with 10+ wins (a total of 43 active players with at least 10 Top-10 wins).
First ever wins for Bautista-Agut, Sijsling and Zeballos. Now 117 active players with at least one Top-10 win.

27 players with wins on each surface (hard outdoors, clay, grass, hard/carpet indoors) and yes, I know that technically indoors is not a surface but you get what I mean.

It's quite incredible that beating Nadal on clay was Zelallos' first win against Top 10 player in his career. Tennis can be unpredictable at times.

This is very interesting!