USO F: [2]Bryans def. [5]Paes/ Stepanek 6-3, 6-4 [Archive] - MensTennisForums.com

USO F: [2]Bryans def. [5]Paes/ Stepanek 6-3, 6-4

Trollin Stone
09-07-2012, 07:06 PM
Well, not a great match. They have the Open era team record for # of GS titles and tied the same all time record (Newcombe/Roche). Also extended the streak of winning at least 1 major in a year for 8 years (also the Open era record, all time record for an individual player and for a team is 9 by Doherty brothers from the beginning of the 20th century; Emerson is another person who won a GS men's doubles title 8 years in a row)

They tied the Open era record for # of USO titles, too (4 by Lutz-Smith, J. Mac has 4 too); all time record is 6 (19th century)

MaxPower
09-07-2012, 07:13 PM
well. not the kind of final that makes doubles more popular. Bryans way too clinical. Kept the errors down and quickly finished off any weak return/shot. Paes/Stepanek gave away too many free points. Never got any real pressure on the twins. Outcome was NID.

alfonsojose
09-07-2012, 07:15 PM
:D Congrats

Pratik
09-07-2012, 07:20 PM
Congrats Bryans for all the records, but even a Bryan brothers would not have been too pleased with this match. It was probably their easiest match in the tournament. They had to almost nothing, apart from a very great retrievals at Paes' dropshots.

Stepanek seemed uninterested, at best. Apart from two points, there was absolutely none of Paes' trademark aggression. The only good game they played was Stepanek's last hold. If they had been so bad initially, they would probably have lost in the second round. The overhead's were one of the worst I have seen. No smashing, just put the ball back into play. Mike even managed to return one smash with his wrong hand. And that was probably the best smash from Paes/Steps in the entire match. And Steps volleying was even worse than in the SF. Just give it straight back to one of the brothers with no pace what soever. To top it all off, the first set was strewn with errors.

I think Paes/Steps could be one of the most inconsistent top teams in recent times. The lack of co-ordination today was laughable. The first set and a half was even worse than the MC QF this year.

Trollin Stone
09-07-2012, 07:35 PM
Congrats Bryans for all the records, but even a Bryan brothers would not have been too pleased with this match. It was probably their easiest match in the tournament. They had to almost nothing, apart from a very great retrievals at Paes' dropshots.

Stepanek seemed uninterested, at best. Apart from two points, there was absolutely none of Paes' trademark aggression. The only good game they played was Stepanek's last hold. If they had been so bad initially, they would probably have lost in the second round. The overhead's were one of the worst I have seen. No smashing, just put the ball back into play. Mike even managed to return one smash with his wrong hand. And that was probably the best smash from Paes/Steps in the entire match. And Steps volleying was even worse than in the SF. Just give it straight back to one of the brothers with no pace what soever. To top it all off, the first set was strewn with errors.

I think Paes/Steps could be one of the most inconsistent top teams in recent times. The lack of co-ordination today was laughable. The first set and a half was even worse than the MC QF this year.

It was Bob iirc. Great summary. Paes anticipated Bryans better than his partner. When Bryans hit something down the middle it was a point for them almost all the time it seems. Well Stepanek won for them the AO final (Paes was good too ofc), the USO final was lost mainly by him.

BTW Bryans are almost certain YE #1, the second team (Mirnyi/Nestor) is more than 2700 points behind in the race. They didnt start the year great but they lead comfortably right now. Whatsmore they got 0 points for their Olympic win

Trollin Stone
09-07-2012, 07:53 PM
http://www.usopen.org/images/pics/misc/f_07SEP12_10175_bryan_bryan.jpg



not a trademark shot today:

http://www.usopen.org/images/pics/misc/f_07SEP12_10193_paes_stepanek.jpg



http://www.usopen.org/images/pics/misc/f_07SEP12_10199_paes_stepanek.jpg



http://www.usopen.org/images/pics/misc/f_0906_2884_bryans_phil.jpg



http://www.usopen.org/images/pics/misc/f_0906_2870_bryans_phil.jpg



http://www.usopen.org/images/pics/misc/f_0906_2995_paes_stepanek_phil.jpg




http://www.usopen.org/images/pics/misc/f_0906_2931_bryans_phil.jpg



http://www.usopen.org/images/pics/misc/f_0906_2907_bryans_phil.jpg

Tommy_Vercetti
09-07-2012, 07:53 PM
Congrats to the Bryans. I thought that after all the seeds went down that they would go too. Since they always seem to lose whenever the draw appears wide open.

Hard to believe that Paes will be 40 next year. I can't imagine how many more GS's he and Bhupathi might have if they had been able to check their ego's for more than one tournament every so often. And it would have been great for the sport to maintain that marquee team.

Trollin Stone
09-07-2012, 08:05 PM
http://www.usopen.org/images/pics/misc/f_0906_3042_bryan_trophy_phil.jpg




http://www.usopen.org/images/pics/misc/f_0906_3043_bryan_trophy_phil.jpg




http://www.usopen.org/images/pics/misc/f_0906_3041_bryan_trophy_phil.jpg





http://www.usopen.org/images/pics/misc/f_0906_3040_bryan_trophy_phil.jpg





http://www.usopen.org/images/pics/misc/f_0906_3044_bryan_trophy_phil.jpg




http://www.usopen.org/images/pics/misc/f_07SEP12_160_BryansFinal.jpg

Pratik
09-07-2012, 08:07 PM
It was Bob iirc.

Don't remember now.

Great pics.

http://www.usopen.org/images/pics/misc/f_0906_2931_bryans_phil.jpg



This was so funny. It actually happened in slow motion.

StevoTG
09-07-2012, 10:10 PM
Too good from the Bryans, not for the first time in a slam. Steps started slow and they were always trying to hang with the Bryans from there.
Nice words from Paes after the match.

SapELee
09-07-2012, 10:20 PM
Congrats :)

arm
09-07-2012, 10:34 PM
Unbelievable :worship: congrats guys :hatoff:

Uranium
09-07-2012, 11:32 PM
Congrats on #12. Now get that 2nd Roland Garros already.
http://www3.pictures.zimbio.com/gi/Bob+Bryan+2012+US+Open+Day+12+hntg3nvKKbUl.jpg

KarlyM
09-08-2012, 12:10 AM
Congrats Bob & Mike! :yeah:

mreccentric
09-08-2012, 06:03 PM
Congrats to the Bryans. I thought that after all the seeds went down that they would go too. Since they always seem to lose whenever the draw appears wide open.

Hard to believe that Paes will be 40 next year. I can't imagine how many more GS's he and Bhupathi might have if they had been able to check their ego's for more than one tournament every so often. And it would have been great for the sport to maintain that marquee team.

It's Over now, they could have done much better if they had played more together... but at an younger age. Even at this age, they have a good record against Bryans and other teams. Just think how it would have been if they did this when they were Young.

*FIRST to reach all the finals of GSs in an year.
*Longest winning streak in Davis Cup.

They hold this two.

Jimnik
09-09-2012, 07:30 AM
Well, not a great match. They have the Open era team record for # of GS titles and tied the same all time record (Newcombe/Roche). Also extended the streak of winning at least 1 major in a year for 8 years (also the Open era record, all time record for an individual player and for a team is 9 by Doherty brothers from the beginning of the 20th century; Emerson is another person who won a GS men's doubles title 8 years in a row)

They tied the Open era record for # of USO titles, too (4 by Lutz-Smith, J. Mac has 4 too); all time record is 6 (19th century)
:worship:

These GOATwins are good. :yeah:

Jimnik
09-09-2012, 07:32 AM
http://www.usopen.org/images/pics/misc/f_0906_3040_bryan_trophy_phil.jpg

Love this image. :bounce:

Jimnik
09-09-2012, 07:34 AM
12 slams, Olympic Gold and back to #1. They should stay there the rest of the year. I just hope they can win one more RG. Their clay record deserves it.

Tommy_Vercetti
09-09-2012, 08:25 AM
It's shocking to me that they only managed to win that one French. Considering how good they are on clay. The Bryans have been underachievers if anything. They could/should have twice as many Slams as they have. I've lost count of how many they pissed away with half-hearted perfomances, especially at Wimbledon when they had dream draws. And they only had to sign up and do well in one more tournament to be year-end #1 in 2008 and they just didn't even seem to care at all about it. Played too lazy a schedule at times, especially in the fall.

Trollin Stone
09-09-2012, 01:55 PM
True about RG, another shocking thing is that they have managed to win multiple slams in 1 year only 3 times and each time they won only 2....