Rafael Nadal and his haters - brilliant article [Archive] - MensTennisForums.com

Rafael Nadal and his haters - brilliant article

Backhand_Maestro
08-15-2012, 03:24 PM
Every few weeks I receive an email with a subject line that reads, “Nadal is a doper.” The message that follows is always about a hundred words, with no puntuation or capital letters. It’s essentially unreadable, though the thrust of it is unmistakable: the author really, really hates Rafael Nadal.

This kind of negative passion is not uncommon in our global tennisverse. I’ve also encountered fans who truly despise Rafa’s great rival, Roger Federer. They find him all too pleased with himself. To me, Federer comes across as rather down to earth for a megamillionaire who has won more major titles -- a whopping 17 -- than anyone else in tennis history. Still, I kind of get where his haters are coming from. There is no angst in Roger Federer; he got rid of every last trace of it -- along with his ponytail -- around the time he won his first Wimbledon. This is hard for some fans to take. Thanks to Ilie Nastase and John McEnroe and Andre Agassi and Jennifer Capriati, we became accustomed to self-loathing tennis stars. We reveled in their psychic pain. Their tirades and destructive behavior made us feel better about ourselves. They may be richer and more talented than we’ll ever be, but that doesn’t make them happy.

But that was then. The world has changed. Everyone on the pro tour today grew up in the Age of Child-Centered Parenting. The tennis circuit is a natural extension of such coddling, especially for the better players. Think Maria Sharapova and her all-enveloping team or Novak Djokovic and his. Top players truly are the center of their own universes
MORE (http://blog.oregonlive.com/tennis/2012/08/rafael_nadal_and_his_haters.html)

finishingmove
08-15-2012, 03:31 PM
with no puntuation

:lol:

JoWillyTso
08-15-2012, 03:34 PM
:lol:

What a joker.

Backhand_Maestro
08-15-2012, 03:34 PM
:lol:

ouch lol :o

sportstennis
08-15-2012, 08:24 PM
Nadal unsportsmansalike

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7FnBi__R4Fs

bump Nadal into Rosol at Wimbledon


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=klQnRrkl-S8&feature=related

arrogant sore loser

IOFH
08-15-2012, 08:28 PM
http://www.pictureshack.us/images/15653_LBJ_funny_dance_DID_NOT_READ.gif

Sophitia36
08-15-2012, 10:35 PM
Very good article, although I don't really agree with everything. As someone said, there are reasons to dislike Nadal. His famous fair-play seems to shatter completely when he is losing - and really, that's the only moment when you can really show fair-play. He claims that he does not give excuses for losing, but in reality, he often does (unlike Ferrer, who truly refrains from giving any excuse at all when he loses and will not comment on anything even when it would be justified to do so).

Then, doping is a tricky issue. I used to be a huge cycling fan, and I was watching closely when the Festina case happened in 1998 and all the shattered illusions that came with it. I spent many, many hours reading about doping and trying to figure out the truth of the matter, when so many people were obviously lying about it.
And to be honest, I cannot take the argument that "accusing people without proof" is that terrible, because, the problem with doping is that you almost NEVER have any proof. For years, people like Armstrong have played us for fools, when everyone knew what was happening. And now that it's too late, they are finally coming up with evidence. This is really difficult to accept.
However, even though I am also a pessimist, and would tend to think that doping has been and still is widespread in almost every sport, I see no reason to single out Nadal for this, except that he wins a lot, which is not enough.

Now, what I really wanted to say, is that I share this guy's puzzlement whenever I see messages by haters.
There are players that I don't like, there have always been.
I hated Safin, I hated Hewitt, and (strangely enough) I hated Kuerten. I used to hate Nadal, now I am slowly overcoming that feeling. I've watched videos of him with the other Spanish players, or the one with Federer, when they're laughing incontrollably... I still don't like watching him play but I'm slowly learning to see another side of his personality that I find more pleasant.

But never in my life would I think of writing messages, let alone send e-mails, to express my hatred... I just don't get it. The amount of frustration people must feel to do this... :confused:
Maybe because, unlike many haters, I am aware of the fact that my dislike for any player is entirely subjective, and you could even say, unfair. I can dislike a player in spite of a very good attitude on court. I can also overlook a player's bad attitude if I like him (Coria for instance).
I will of course be frustrated whenever a player I dislike defeats someone I like. But celebrating it when one of my "hated" players lose? That's a weird idea to me. It never makes me THAT happy to see anyone lose.
So, in no way would I feel that my hatred for a player is legitimate and deserves to be expressed. I think those people simply have a distorted vision of the nature of their own dislike for a player, and of its importance...

I've just seen that Nadal is out of the US Open, well, I may not regret it truly because it gives more opportunities to other players I like better than him, but I will not celebrate it, either. It's always quite sad when a talented player cannot play because of an injury, so I hope he will recover soon.

MuzzahLovah
08-15-2012, 10:42 PM
:lol:

:rolls:

redshift36188
08-15-2012, 10:47 PM
He has "punctuation" now. He wasn't joking. Fail! :o

DJ Soup
08-15-2012, 11:04 PM
bad article

where's the talk about his time-wasting on court. About him constantly breaking the rules. About Toni coaching in a match.
where's the talk about him whining for a bi-annual ranking, in spite it's against the interest of non-top 10 players.
and his bitching about blue clay (it's not the colour that is the problem)

moon language
08-15-2012, 11:21 PM
bad article

where's the talk about his time-wasting on court. About him constantly breaking the rules. About Toni coaching in a match.
where's the talk about him whining for a bi-annual ranking, in spite it's against the interest of non-top 10 players.
and his bitching about blue clay (it's not the colour that is the problem)

Nice punctuation.

DJ Soup
08-15-2012, 11:27 PM
Nice punctuation.

fo sizzle ma nizzle

motorhead
08-15-2012, 11:56 PM
awful article.

Kat_YYZ
08-16-2012, 12:18 AM
nothing new in that article :shrug:

Han Solo
08-16-2012, 02:44 AM
Very good article, although I don't really agree with everything. As someone said, there are reasons to dislike Nadal. His famous fair-play seems to shatter completely when he is losing - and really, that's the only moment when you can really show fair-play. He claims that he does not give excuses for losing, but in reality, he often does (unlike Ferrer, who truly refrains from giving any excuse at all when he loses and will not comment on anything even when it would be justified to do so).

Then, doping is a tricky issue. I used to be a huge cycling fan, and I was watching closely when the Festina case happened in 1998 and all the shattered illusions that came with it. I spent many, many hours reading about doping and trying to figure out the truth of the matter, when so many people were obviously lying about it.
And to be honest, I cannot take the argument that "accusing people without proof" is that terrible, because, the problem with doping is that you almost NEVER have any proof. For years, people like Armstrong have played us for fools, when everyone knew what was happening. And now that it's too late, they are finally coming up with evidence. This is really difficult to accept.
However, even though I am also a pessimist, and would tend to think that doping has been and still is widespread in almost every sport, I see no reason to single out Nadal for this, except that he wins a lot, which is not enough.

Now, what I really wanted to say, is that I share this guy's puzzlement whenever I see messages by haters.
There are players that I don't like, there have always been.
I hated Safin, I hated Hewitt, and (strangely enough) I hated Kuerten. I used to hate Nadal, now I am slowly overcoming that feeling. I've watched videos of him with the other Spanish players, or the one with Federer, when they're laughing incontrollably... I still don't like watching him play but I'm slowly learning to see another side of his personality that I find more pleasant.

But never in my life would I think of writing messages, let alone send e-mails, to express my hatred... I just don't get it. The amount of frustration people must feel to do this... :confused:
Maybe because, unlike many haters, I am aware of the fact that my dislike for any player is entirely subjective, and you could even say, unfair. I can dislike a player in spite of a very good attitude on court. I can also overlook a player's bad attitude if I like him (Coria for instance).
I will of course be frustrated whenever a player I dislike defeats someone I like. But celebrating it when one of my "hated" players lose? That's a weird idea to me. It never makes me THAT happy to see anyone lose.
So, in no way would I feel that my hatred for a player is legitimate and deserves to be expressed. I think those people simply have a distorted vision of the nature of their own dislike for a player, and of its importance...

I've just seen that Nadal is out of the US Open, well, I may not regret it truly because it gives more opportunities to other players I like better than him, but I will not celebrate it, either. It's always quite sad when a talented player cannot play because of an injury, so I hope he will recover soon.

Agreed. Although Nadal's physique, incredible stamina and recovery time between matches, his peaks and troughs in performance are probably also used by those who ask questions of doping controls in tennis and their effectiveness...

sportstennis
08-18-2012, 04:50 AM
funny

moon language
08-18-2012, 04:53 AM
fo sizzle ma nizzle

Sorry, but it's "shizzle".

fsoica
08-18-2012, 05:19 AM
if that article is brilliant then I could win Pulitzer easily...

Mountaindewslave
08-18-2012, 06:36 AM
Nadal unsportsmansalike

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7FnBi__R4Fs

bump Nadal into Rosol at Wimbledon


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=klQnRrkl-S8&feature=related

arrogant sore loser

you guys are such trolls, including some admins on here who bring up time and time again the Nadal bump into Rosol. watch the video and unless you are blind it appears as nothing but a little nudge. it's almost impossible to even tell if it's deliberate because there's not much space and even if it was he hardly touched him! very very slight nudge. you all are just sore about Nadal in general and take any opportunity to try and slander a very respectable and honestly open nice player. the only ammunition to be aimed at Nadal is that now and then in his career he underplays himself too much in pressers and occasionally might act too skeptical about his physical condition. his class has always been there and hopefully always will

Mountaindewslave
08-18-2012, 06:40 AM
bad article

where's the talk about his time-wasting on court. About him constantly breaking the rules. About Toni coaching in a match.
where's the talk about him whining for a bi-annual ranking, in spite it's against the interest of non-top 10 players.
and his bitching about blue clay (it's not the colour that is the problem)

it's irrelevant because it's not up to Nadal to moderate himself on court, its up to the umps. don't be upset at him that they don't care. if you have a problem with it you should be taking your anger out on the people responsible for ensuring that the rules are followed- the officials on court. Toni doesn't really coach persay. and if and when, very few and far between in his career.

it's really not a 'bad' thing that Nadal argued for a change in the ranking system. Although I and others do not agree with it, it does not mean he is not allowed to try and change things to his preferences. this is a free world after all, with freedom of thought.

the color of the blue clay actually did bother a lot of players (it's quite unusual and hard to adjust to such a dramatic change) AND he obviously had problems with the texture as well as he mentioned that he couldn't move properly on the slippery blue clay.

the article was pointing out that throughout Nadal's career he has an extremely consistant personality and often does not get the credit he deserves as well as that there is a lot of unfounded and unecessary hate for him as a player