Federer: Best ever [Archive] - MensTennisForums.com

Federer: Best ever

Yami Marick
09-12-2004, 11:05 PM
-4 Grandslams
-The 2nd player to have two 6-0 sets in a Grand Slam Championship
- Great on all surfaces
- Only 23
- Has a 64-6 record for the year
- Has 20 titles
- Has had a 23 match winning streak
- Will dominate the game
- Has serves clocked at up to 135 MPH!
- Plays with such grace, and consistency
- Has all the shots in the game
- Has amazing shots
- THE BEST EVER

Rodger Federer: :worship: :worship: :worship: :worship:

So happy you won: :bounce: :bounce: :bounce::bounce::bounce::bounce::bounce:

US OPEN Champion: :woohoo::woohoo::woohoo::woohoo::woohoo:

makro120
09-12-2004, 11:32 PM
YES, he already is the best ever. Only Rod Laver fans could argue against this, even if I haven't seen Rod Laver play I know the time he played was much less competitive than today. Anyway, Fed will HAVE TO win a grand slam to definetly be called the best ever...

WF4EVER
09-13-2004, 02:30 AM
Because he has the most complete game it doesn't mean he'll produce results comparable to those who have preceeded him. Truly, Roger has the potential, but that doesn't mean it will ever happen.

speedracer
09-13-2004, 03:49 AM
If he stays healthy and dedicated, 10 GS is a realistic goal for him, I think.

sbartel
09-13-2004, 04:29 AM
-4 Grandslams
-The 2nd player to have two 6-0 sets in a Grand Slam Championship
- Great on all surfaces
- Only 23
- Has a 64-6 record for the year
- Has all the shots in the game
- Has amazing shots
- THE BEST EVER

Let's not get ahead of ourselves. Federer is great, but look at point #2: He's only 23 - let's judge him after.

And btw, didn't a guy named Sampras just retired? You know, the guy who owns 10 more grand slams than Federer?

Daniel
09-13-2004, 07:40 AM
yes , Roger :worship: :worship:

Fergie
09-13-2004, 12:53 PM
Roger is the best :worship:

Auscon
09-13-2004, 12:56 PM
How many slams did Sampras have at 23?

speedracer
09-13-2004, 01:27 PM
He had 5 slams after USO-94( he was exactly the same age as Roger because both were born in August).

Goenitz_196
09-13-2004, 01:32 PM
Yami Marick - are you also Love on this board? Because the both of you match each other in terms of being retarded and dumb.

jtipson
09-13-2004, 01:42 PM
Roger needs either AO or RG 2005 to be on a par with Pete.

David Kenzie
09-13-2004, 01:45 PM
-4 Grandslams
-The 2nd player to have two 6-0 sets in a Grand Slam Championship
- Great on all surfaces
- Only 23
- Has a 64-6 record for the year
- Has 20 titles
- Has had a 23 match winning streak
- Will dominate the game
- Has serves clocked at up to 135 MPH!
- Plays with such grace, and consistency
- Has all the shots in the game
- Has amazing shots
- THE BEST EVER


you mean in a grand slam final. cause there have already been 6-0 6-0 6-0 scores in grand slams

Fumus
09-13-2004, 01:50 PM
eh...we can have this discussion in 5 years, he's cleary a great talent and clearly the best player on the tour at the moment.

pinky
09-13-2004, 02:11 PM
Roger needs either AO or RG 2005 to be on a par with Pete.

AO to be on par yes, but if he gets RG 2005 he would be clearly over Sampras!

Fondueischguät
09-13-2004, 02:13 PM
Wait to the end of his career before anyone can say with any conviction that he is the greatest ever, he has a special talent and had a wonderful year, but he is not the best ever, yet.