What If's? Wimbledon Scenarios [Archive] - MensTennisForums.com

What If's? Wimbledon Scenarios

Ububub
06-18-2009, 12:57 PM
A lot is riding on Nadal and Federer defending last year's points:

If Nadal doesn't play, and Murray beats Federer in the Final:
Nad 10,735 pts.
Mur 10,730
Fed 10,420

If Nadal doesn't play, and Federer beats Murray in the Final:

Fed 11,220
Nad 10,735
Mur 9,930

If Nadal doesn't play, Fed reaches Quarters, Murray Semis and Djoko wins:

Nad 10,735
Djo 9,790
Fed 9,580
Mur 9,450

finishingmove
06-18-2009, 02:26 PM
nadal will beat federer in the final.

djokovic and murray will reach semis at best.

give me a point projection for that

SaFed2005
06-18-2009, 02:32 PM
what if Federer beats Nadal in the final?

finishingmove
06-18-2009, 02:36 PM
what if Federer beats Nadal in the final?

nadal wears a clownsuit for at least a week.

angry1
06-18-2009, 03:00 PM
nadal will beat federer in the final.

djokovic and murray will reach semis at best.

give me a point projection for that

Assuming above is correct and I haven't ballsed it up

Nadal 12,735 if winner
Federer 10,420 if runner up
Murray 9,450 if semi loser
Djokovic 8,510 if semi loser

EnriqueIG8
06-18-2009, 03:06 PM
http://www.atpworldtour.com/News/Tennis/2009/06/Shark-Bites-Battle-For-No-1.aspx

There is all you need to know

EnriqueIG8
06-18-2009, 03:09 PM
what if Federer beats Nadal in the final?

Nadal - 12735 points
Federer - 11220 points

miura
06-18-2009, 03:20 PM
Ah, gotta love those 'what if' predictions :lol:

RonE
06-18-2009, 03:21 PM
Nadal - 12735 points
Federer - 11220 points

Don't you mean :

Nadal - 11,935 pts
Federer - 11,220 pts

?

MacTheKnife
06-18-2009, 03:45 PM
http://www.atpworldtour.com/News/Tennis/2009/06/Shark-Bites-Battle-For-No-1.aspx

There is all you need to know

That's the clearest thing I've seen. Thanks for posting. ;)

EnriqueIG8
06-18-2009, 03:58 PM
Don't you mean :

Nadal - 11,935 pts
Federer - 11,220 pts

?

Yes you are right :p
There can't be 2 Wimbledon winners.

angry1
06-18-2009, 04:03 PM
That's the clearest thing I've seen. Thanks for posting. ;)

It is if you read it properly,I didn't notice the disclaimer about Djokovic being assumed to have won Halle.

Sunset of Age
06-18-2009, 04:23 PM
Yes you are right :p
There can't be 2 Wimbledon winners.

Too bad. :angel:

DJ Soup
06-18-2009, 06:11 PM
Yes you are right :p
There can't be 2 Wimbledon winners.

it would have been AWWWWWSOMEE!"!"ˇ!

cmasters
06-18-2009, 06:20 PM
Stinks that Fed could be holding 3 majors and still be behind Nadal.

DJ Soup
06-18-2009, 06:48 PM
Stinks that Fed could be holding 3 majors and still be behind Nadal.

Federer could make a difference in the indoor season, now that David is absent ;)

Goldenoldie
06-18-2009, 07:00 PM
A lot is riding on Nadal and Federer defending last year's points:

If Nadal doesn't play, and Murray beats Federer in the Final:
Nad 10,735 pts.
Mur 10,730
Fed 10,420



Murray could then go to #1 on 20th July, when he loses his 0-pointer for Indianapolis, and gets 250 for Queens.

Realistically though, I can't see him beating Federer in the final, if he even gets there.