Documentary on Noam Chomsky, if you have time, take a look. Very Interesting.

02-28-2009, 01:35 AM
This is a documentary, found on Youtube that speaks about Noam Chosmky, one of the 10 most referenced sources in history, along with The Bible and Socrates.

I admit, it might be too long for a forum user, and I don't expect many people to watch it, but when you get a chance, look at this film it's quite fun and informative and if you want, leave a comment.

Part 1:

Part 2:

Part 3:

Part 4:

Part 5:

Part 6:

Part 7:

Part 8:

I hope you've found this entertaining.

03-02-2009, 02:39 AM
No views? :sad:

03-02-2009, 10:26 PM
Who cares? He's dead. Chavez disappeared him in a practice run.

03-02-2009, 10:29 PM
Who cares?

I would have probably cared, up to a few months ago.
I've decided to retire from politics this year:)
It's started making me feel bitter.
However, I still do admire other people's passion about it.:)

03-02-2009, 10:31 PM
Chavez disappeared him in a practice run.

HAHA- brilliant!:D

(shit, you've got me into it:p)

03-02-2009, 11:04 PM
He's cited by the far leftist field of academia, that's the statistic.

03-03-2009, 03:48 AM
They usually dismiss him as an extreme leftist (in the US Media), even though he disagrees with that label.

No politician, either democrat or independant even mentions Chomsky.

Yet few dare refute his facts.

The only politician who has a slight resemblance to what Chomsky says about US foreign policy is, suprisingly a "republican": Ron Paul.

03-03-2009, 11:29 AM
He's cited by the far leftist field of academia, that's the statistic.

His word is considered of equal importance to the truths of the bible.

03-03-2009, 11:34 AM
There is a Spanish word that pretty much defines him perfectly: charlatán.

Sorry, couldn't find a proper Englih word for that. Anyway, his body of work besides linguistics is largely irrelevant even though, as any self-respecing cult leader, he's got his very dedicated fanbase.

Henry Chinaski
03-03-2009, 01:34 PM
charlatan is an english word now too.

once again you've chosen vague hyperbole over a credible argument.