Verdasco def. Ancic 6/2,6/3 [Archive] - MensTennisForums.com

Verdasco def. Ancic 6/2,6/3

Machiavelli
01-07-2009, 07:07 AM
Mario is obviously far from his best, no chance against Nando.....

finishingmove
01-07-2009, 07:14 AM
lucky one for the spaniard

Mimi
01-07-2009, 07:17 AM
:mad:

betowiec
01-07-2009, 07:17 AM
lucky one for the spaniard

routine for the Spaniard

malisha
01-07-2009, 07:23 AM
disgrace...Tomić got more games...sad day for tennis...less talented and onedimensional player won this one

federernadalfan
01-07-2009, 07:25 AM
tough luck for mario, but had a long match the day before

HoistDaColors
01-07-2009, 07:31 AM
it's okay mario. you beat him at wimbledon. :angel:

malisha
01-07-2009, 07:31 AM
so a professional athlete cant play(serve) for 3 hours and he is allready tired ..:confused:...he plays crap and thats why he lost

JolánGagó
01-07-2009, 08:33 AM
Totally expected, the better player prevailed.

scoobs
01-07-2009, 08:36 AM
Bit of revenge for the Wimbledon third round last year for Nando - surprised it was that one sided though.

malisha
01-07-2009, 08:43 AM
Totally expected, the better player prevailed.

was Nando in top 10,...:confused:...his performances on big stage just merits his talent...his fluke title on MM tournament against injured Andreev is his top...Ancic is a top 10 Indoor+Grass player..this isnt an opinion..results show it...

JolánGagó
01-07-2009, 09:10 AM
was Nando in top 10,...:confused:...his performances on big stage just merits his talent...his fluke title on MM tournament against injured Andreev is his top...Ancic is a top 10 Indoor+Grass player..this isnt an opinion..results show it...

Ancic being better than Nando is indeed an opinion of yours.

jonathancrane
01-07-2009, 09:32 AM
Ancic > Nando
But not today

Forehander
01-07-2009, 11:05 AM
For people who say Ancic is the better player, why? Please just tell me what is good about Ancic's game? He was never a talent. He was always overrated. His ground strokes are technically bad and his serve is horrific for his height. In what field is he better than Verdasco other than his luck from previous years which have now obviously ran out?

Iván
01-07-2009, 11:05 AM
Ancic hasnt really been the same since his ilness, will he ever recover his best, i dont know.

Igaarg
01-07-2009, 12:17 PM
I can´t believe it, I´m so disapointed. Hope Ancic get better.

Clydey
01-07-2009, 01:01 PM
Ancic obviously isn't at his best still, but I honestly think the game has moved on since he was a top player. I'd be surprised if he ever got back in the top 10.

Nidhogg
01-07-2009, 07:22 PM
Ancic obviously isn't at his best still, but I honestly think the game has moved on since he was a top player. I'd be surprised if he ever got back in the top 10.

True. Tournaments with fast surfaces are getting rare. How Ferrer beat him on grass last year is just comedial. As I remember the ATP even decided to remove carpet as a surface for this season.

HoistDaColors
01-07-2009, 08:54 PM
Bit of revenge for the Wimbledon third round last year for Nando - surprised it was that one sided though.

I think that was the fourth round because I remember that Verdasco was on the verge of getting a first ever grand slam QF berth when he was leading 2 sets up. You might be thinking of that 3rd round phenomenal match against Ferrer. ;)

GlennMirnyi
01-08-2009, 02:19 AM
I think that was the fourth round because I remember that Verdasco was on the verge of getting a first ever grand slam QF berth when he was leading 2 sets up. You might be thinking of that 3rd round phenomenal match against Ferrer. ;)

Ferrer beat Ancic in Hertogenbosch.