EIGHTY ONE Winners!!!! [Archive] - MensTennisForums.com

EIGHTY ONE Winners!!!!

Chloe le Bopper
09-03-2002, 01:41 AM
I wanted Greg to win cause he was on my team for some game, but come on...

EIGTHY ONE winners for pete :o

When is the last time someone hit 81 freaking winners in a match? Does he want it or what!

jrm
09-03-2002, 01:42 AM
go pete, go pete

Chloe le Bopper
09-03-2002, 01:46 AM
He's became my sentimental favourite I think ;)

Chloe le Bopper
09-03-2002, 01:47 AM
Too bad he plays Tommy next :(

I like Haas, I'm going to be torn :(

TennisHack
09-03-2002, 02:00 AM
I would argue that it was Rusedski's 10 double faults that did him in. His serve is so essential to his game . . . after all, Pete only won the match by five points.

renatoal
09-03-2002, 02:13 AM
An amazing Kuerten hit MORE then 100 winners in his match against Mirnyi last year in USopen .... But Sampras look impressive today .... but I think he will bounced off against Haas ...:cool:

Chloe le Bopper
09-03-2002, 03:03 AM
Thankyou, I had forgotten about Kuerten's amazing winners last year ;)

Lily
09-03-2002, 04:45 AM
Kuerten had 103 winners and only 13 UE in 5 sets.

Not that i remember or anything ;)

Scotso
09-03-2002, 10:44 AM
Sorry to be "pessimistic" but it's easy to have a high # of winners and low # of errors when playing a serve/volleyer if you're doing "ok." A pass is a winner, and if you miss, they usually put away the volley. So, yeah.

Dissident
09-03-2002, 02:26 PM
Mirnyi himself had a huge amount of winners in that match as well. I dont remember if it was over 100, but he was the serve and volleier and did the same.
And as for Pete, 81 is damn too much and its hell not easy. Even if he was playing my mom. :p :o

Dissident
09-03-2002, 02:26 PM
btw, I forgot to add:

GO PETE! prove them all wrong! :D

TennisHack
09-03-2002, 04:18 PM
hitman, you've gone over to the dark side?! ;)

Chloe le Bopper
09-04-2002, 07:22 PM
lol I think I know why hitman is rooting for Pete ;) ;) ;)

Sorry to be "pessimistic" but it's easy to have a high # of winners and low # of errors when playing a serve/volleyer if you're doing "ok." A pass is a winner, and if you miss, they usually put away the volley. So, yeah.

If this is so easy, why dont I see more of it? So, yeah.

TennisHack
09-04-2002, 07:50 PM
Originally posted by Rebecca
lol I think I know why hitman is rooting for Pete ;) ;) ;)

::feeling left out :sad::

Dissident
09-04-2002, 10:09 PM
HEY! I was the one to always say the guy should stay around because I enjoyed seeing him play. And I really do. :)
I hope he kicks ass and prove everyone wrong. :D

And btw, he hit other 82 winners yesterday. AND GUESS WHAT? No serve-volleyer this time!!!! http://www.stopstart.fsnet.co.uk/smilie/eek2.gif http://www.stopstart.fsnet.co.uk/smilie/moreek.gif

http://www.usopen.org/scores/stats/day9/0117ms.html

Chloe le Bopper
09-04-2002, 10:22 PM
here I was thinking you were rooting AGAINST his opponent ;););)

82 and no serve and volleyer? *bites tongue*

Way to go pete :)