Kuerten (2000) form vs Federer (2006) [Archive] - MensTennisForums.com

Kuerten (2000) form vs Federer (2006)

Halba
11-04-2006, 09:19 AM
who would win? Would it be a close contest? Kuerten was the world's best player following his 2000 masters cup victory. Could make Fed's backhand look like smoke. Thrashed sampras and agassi in straights

Action Jackson
11-04-2006, 09:20 AM
Do we need another one of these threads?

disturb3d
11-04-2006, 09:31 AM
Jorje. Whose the Juan Ignacio Chela lookalike in your av.

TennisGrandSlam
11-04-2006, 09:41 AM
who would win? Would it be a close contest? Kuerten was the world's best player following his 2000 masters cup victory. Could make Fed's backhand look like smoke. Thrashed sampras and agassi in straights



You should ask Guga 2000 vs C'mon 2001 :smoke:


:smoke: :smoke: :smoke:

scarecrows
11-04-2006, 10:30 AM
Jorje. Whose the Juan Ignacio Chela lookalike in your av.

that's Andreas Seppi dude

where do you see the similarity?

Ariadne
11-04-2006, 10:38 AM
How lovely, another one of "those" threads... :rolleyes:

Frustra laborant quotquot se calculationibus fatigant pro inventione quadraturae circuli. :wavey:

Andre♥
11-04-2006, 12:50 PM
Federer would win.

Trust me, I love Guga and I was there when he won the Masters Cup in Lisbon. The whole stadium went nuts with his win, since we always treat a brazilian player like a portuguese one.

Kuerten did his best match ever outside a claycourt in his final against Agassi. He needed that win to be the number one of the year and his performance was a one in a million performance. And he really needed that since Agassi outplayed him in the group stage.

Kuerten would beat Federer with that performance, but if Guga couldn't perform like that, Federer would roll him.

guga2120
11-04-2006, 04:57 PM
It would be close, Kuerten on clay most likely beats him. Everywhere else Federer would win, unfortunately.

Ernham
11-04-2006, 05:00 PM
Wow. He trashed a geriatric sampras and a young federer. So did Haas, several times no less.

MarieS
11-04-2006, 05:32 PM
:rolleyes: how is there ever any way of telling?

deliveryman
11-04-2006, 06:33 PM
Outside of clay: Federer and easily.

Even on clay I think it would only be like 60-40/55-45 for Guga.

Arnold Fitzgeral
11-06-2006, 06:15 PM
Clay? Guga would win; Guga is an alltime great. Federer has hardly achieved anything on clay to be mentioned in that way.

NYCtennisfan
11-06-2006, 07:57 PM
Clay? Guga would win; Guga is an alltime great. Federer has hardly achieved anything on clay to be mentioned in that way.

Lifetime achievement has nothing to do with a one-time matchup. Hewitt beat Guga on clay. Federer himself beat up on Guga pretty well on clay.

shotgun
11-06-2006, 08:03 PM
Poor Guga, people here just can't leave him alone. :lol:

Lee
11-06-2006, 08:16 PM
Poor Guga, people here just can't leave him alone. :lol:

Pretty amazing as he hardly plays these days.

So the easiest rule to get famous in MTF is say the magic words...........






"Federer" , "Nadal" , "Sampars" ;)

Fedex
11-06-2006, 09:02 PM
Clay? Guga would win; Guga is an alltime great. Federer has hardly achieved anything on clay to be mentioned in that way.
All time great? 3 Grand Slam titles does not equal 'all time great' in my book. One of the best clay court players ever? Sure. And what's the point of this thread anyway? Outside of clay, Guga was never a dominant #1.