SO TRUE<MICHEAL CHANG>SO TRUE. [Archive] - MensTennisForums.com

SO TRUE<MICHEAL CHANG>SO TRUE.

angiel
10-17-2006, 05:31 PM
Former French Open champion Michael Chang believes that current World number one Roger Federer compares with the greatest players of all-time. Since the beginning of 2004, the 25-year-old Federer has a 232-15 win-loss record with 31 titles, including eight of his nine Grand Slam titles.

"If he is not the best, he is certainly up there for sure," Chang told the New York Times. Chang, 34, who retired in 2003, also claimed playing among a generation of baseliners helps Federer's domination, and that had he played in Pete Sampras' era, things might have been different.

"It would be interesting to see them play at both the peak of their careers," continued Chang, remembered by most as the youngest-ever winner of a Grand Slam singles title when he triumphed in the French Open in 1989.

"I think it is a little easier for Federer nowadays because he doesn't have to deal with too many pure serve-and-volleyers.

"I think in Pete's day we had a combination of pure serve-and-volleyers in guys like Becker and [Stefan] Edberg and also really strong baseliners as well."

Federer is scheduled to play in tournaments in Madrid, Basel, Paris before the ATP Masters Cup in Shanghai for the season-ending championships.

[B]Eurosport - AS - 11/10/2006 18:24

Deathless Mortal
10-17-2006, 05:39 PM
Yeah, whatever.

bokehlicious
10-17-2006, 05:47 PM
Angiel's back to GM with her worshipping Sampras bs... :zzz: :zzz:

Hendu
10-17-2006, 05:47 PM
Well, its not like he discovered gunpowder.

scoobs
10-17-2006, 06:14 PM
Pete who?

Howard
10-17-2006, 06:20 PM
People are always wondering how Roger would do in the previous era. How about turn it around and ask how Sampras would do today’s era of powerful baseliners. He’d still beat anyone (except Fed) on grass. (I suspect they’d be pretty even). He’d have no chance on clay, and he’d be made to grind it out a lot more on hard and indoor courts, something which Sampras didn’t like to do.

The reason there aren’t many serve and volleyers today isn’t because players are less skilled or athletic, it’s because the groundstrokes are so powerful that it’s much more difficult to win at the net. And guys like Sampras and Edberg would find that out very quickly.

alfonsojose
10-17-2006, 06:40 PM
:yawn:

stop posting this boring crap and go babysitting for Pete :wavey: