who is the best youngster on fast surfaces?? [Archive] - MensTennisForums.com

who is the best youngster on fast surfaces??

richie21
09-09-2006, 06:44 PM
i'll go with Nadal because of his (relative) consistency comparing to the other youngsters.....but that's not by much.

NeverSayDie
09-09-2006, 07:58 PM
Richie because he's :drool:.......*cough* I mean because he is consistent on all surfaces :P

~*BGT*~
09-09-2006, 08:12 PM
Richie because he's :drool:.......*cough* I mean because he is consistent on all surfaces :P
LOL, I chose Gasquet becaus he has more success than the others on grass and fast hc's.

MurrayFan1
09-09-2006, 08:23 PM
OK, why is Monfils in this?

Cristine
09-09-2006, 08:33 PM
OK, why is Monfils in this?
The question is: who picked Monfils?

richie21
09-09-2006, 08:58 PM
OK, why is Monfils in this?

well i don t like him (as a player, i mean) but who would you put instead of him??

Boris Franz Ecker
09-09-2006, 09:03 PM
Nadal

markom
09-09-2006, 09:23 PM
think ancic is among the best ,hope he will prove it in forthcoming indoor season after missed usa series.

cmurray
09-09-2006, 09:26 PM
I picked Berdych, though Gasquet and Murray aren't too shabby either.

oschemi
09-09-2006, 09:28 PM
Gasquet is getting the most votes? :retard: :retard:
Like it or not, none of these youngsters have achieved close to what Nadal has achieved on fast surfaces. What a stupid poll

Cristine
09-09-2006, 09:31 PM
Gasquet made an AMS final this year and Berdych won Paris last year :retard:

Cristine
09-09-2006, 09:32 PM
well i don t like him (as a player, i mean) but who would you put instead of him??
Mario :angel: :p

richie21
09-09-2006, 09:36 PM
think ancic is among the best ,hope he will prove it in forthcoming indoor season after missed usa series.

i only considered the players who are still under 22 ;)

oschemi
09-09-2006, 09:38 PM
Gasquet made an AMS final this year and Berdych won Paris last year :retard:

What else have they done that should warrant more votes than Nadal. I mean list the comparison. :retard: :retard:

sorrowman
09-09-2006, 09:38 PM
Nadal have more titles than all the others together on hard , and only for this I dont think that you can compare Nadal with them....

oschemi
09-09-2006, 09:40 PM
Nadal have more titles than all the others together on hard , and only for this I dont think that you can compare Nadal with them....

I mean this is the most retarded thread I have ever seen. Gosh :rolleyes:

Allure
09-09-2006, 09:43 PM
Nadal have more titles than all the others together on hard , and only for this I dont think that you can compare Nadal with them....

Maybe some people are judging on talent than accomplishments.

oschemi
09-09-2006, 09:44 PM
Maybe some people are judging on talent than accomplishments.

Huh??

Cristine
09-09-2006, 09:45 PM
What else have they done that should warrant more votes than Nadal. I mean list the comparison. :retard: :retard:
I understood your point, but right now, Richard is playing better then Rafa, so i think it's normal that people pick him instead of Nadal. :o I mean, it's not a :eek: . :p

Allure
09-09-2006, 09:49 PM
Huh??

Okay you say Nadal has more titles than the rest so he should be leading the poll. But just because he won more doesnt mean he's "better" or more "talented." ;)

oschemi
09-09-2006, 09:52 PM
Okay you say Nadal has more titles than the rest so he should be leading the poll. But just because he won more doesnt mean he's "better" or more "talented." ;)

He is better and more talented period. I cant believe people are still sayiing that Nadal is not talented. It is one thing to not like his game, that is ok. But to question his talent is just :retard: :retard:

Cristine
09-09-2006, 09:56 PM
Nadal have more titles than all the others together on hard , and only for this I dont think that you can compare Nadal with them....
Nadal: Montreal + Dubai + Beijing + Madrid = 4
Other: Nottingham + Nottingham (Richard) + Paris (Tomas) + San Jose (Murray) = 4

:p :p :p

sorrowman
09-09-2006, 10:03 PM
Nadal: Montreal + Dubai + Beijing + Madrid = 4
Other: Nottingham + Nottingham (Richard) + Paris (Tomas) + San Jose (Murray) = 4

:p :p :p
yes but have more important titles,2 master series :p :P

Allure
09-09-2006, 10:20 PM
He is better and more talented period. I cant believe people are still sayiing that Nadal is not talented. It is one thing to not like his game, that is ok. But to question his talent is just :retard: :retard:

I'm not saying he is not talented. Obviously to win 4 hard court titles one needs talent. ;)

Cristine
09-09-2006, 10:40 PM
yes but have more important titles,2 master series :p :P
I know :hug: :)
I was just kidding :p

richie21
09-09-2006, 10:41 PM
yes but have more important titles,2 master series :p :P

2 master series where Federer wasn t playing :o ...but still well done to him to have won them.
in comparaison,Richie made a MS final on hard court few weeks ago but he had to face Roger in final.

Radek Stepanek
09-10-2006, 03:10 AM
If based on results, Nadal is . . . that is why I don't understand what everyone is saying. He has gotten further than most of these guys, at several hard court tournaments.

Scotso
09-10-2006, 05:11 AM
Berdych

jenanun
09-10-2006, 10:47 AM
nadal shouldnt been in this poll

he belongs to another league (the two men *federer-nadal* league)..... it is an insult to him to put him in the poll.....

richie21
12-25-2006, 12:36 AM
a small up to this thread :)

cartmancop
12-25-2006, 01:56 AM
Gasquet, he could have done great things @ Wimbledon this year, if it wasn't for his unlucky draw... unlucky is an understatement :lol:

jazar
12-25-2006, 10:07 AM
nadal stands too far behind the baseline to be really effective on a fast court and he needs to step up and take the return of serve early.
baghdatis is solid on every surface, he just needs to get consistency week to week.
murray needs to develop a killer shot, then he will be better on fast courts.
gasquet is a bit of an enigma, he should be good on every surface, but struggles, maybe his swings are a bit too long for a fast court.
monfils sucks.
berdych has a big game and it suits fast courts better than any of the others.
djokovic is like murray, he needs a killer shot.