My analysis of FEDERER game [Archive] - MensTennisForums.com

My analysis of FEDERER game

kapranos
09-07-2006, 02:07 AM
- Serve: DECENT, but could be slighly more powerful. Usually well placed.

- Forehand. Not bad. Could cut the UE errors a bit!!!

- Backhand. Nice, but would be more effective with 2 hands.

- Volley: not flawless, but ok.

- Lob: usually high.

- drop shots, good. Not great. Good.

- Stamina: insuffisant.

- Charisma: inexistant.

- Luck: excessive in draws.

- Fans: not enough. Nadal more popular!!!

- Xristos: better than GeorgeWNazi!!!!!!!!

adee-gee
09-07-2006, 02:11 AM
My analysis of this thread - Not funny.

scarecrows
09-07-2006, 10:41 AM
this thread :worship:

Halba
09-07-2006, 11:14 AM
- Serve: DECENT, but could be slighly more powerful. Usually well placed.

- Forehand. Not bad. Could cut the UE errors a bit!!!

- Backhand. Nice, but would be more effective with 2 hands.

- Volley: not flawless, but ok.

- Lob: usually high.

- drop shots, good. Not great. Good.

- Stamina: insuffisant.

- Charisma: inexistant.

- Luck: excessive in draws.

- Fans: not enough. Nadal more popular!!!

- Xristos: better than GeorgeWNazi!!!!!!!!


you spelt insuffisant. wrong
you spelt inexistant wrong.

should be insufficient, and inexistent respectively

So with all those errors, who can lift to beat Fed? Should be easy for a guy with a big game and a two handed backhand shouldn't it?

Adler
09-07-2006, 12:29 PM
Well, we all know Federer is playing shit and his domination is about to end

HKz
10-05-2010, 11:12 AM
What a failed poster and thread.

RIboy
10-05-2010, 11:51 AM
- Serve: DECENT, but could be slighly more powerful. Usually well placed.

- Forehand. Not bad. Could cut the UE errors a bit!!!

- Backhand. Nice, but would be more effective with 2 hands.

- Volley: not flawless, but ok.

- Lob: usually high.

- drop shots, good. Not great. Good.

- Stamina: insuffisant.

- Charisma: inexistant.

- Luck: excessive in draws.

- Fans: not enough. Nadal more popular!!!

- Xristos: better than GeorgeWNazi!!!!!!!!

man, you're genious....kudos

finishingmove
10-05-2010, 11:53 AM
- Serve: DECENT, but could be slighly more powerful. Usually well placed.

- Forehand. Not bad. Could cut the UE errors a bit!!!

- Backhand. Nice, but would be more effective with 2 hands.

- Volley: not flawless, but ok.

- Lob: usually high.

- drop shots, good. Not great. Good.

- Stamina: insuffisant.

- Charisma: inexistant.

- Luck: excessive in draws.

- Fans: not enough. Nadal more popular!!!

- Xristos: better than GeorgeWNazi!!!!!!!!

ok let's revise:

serve: reliable.

forehand: pretty bad. could really cut down on the errors.

backhand: still the same.

volley: ok.

lob: see 'tweener'.

drop shot: mediocre.

stamina: pretty good.

charisma: -3 class penalty.

luck: has run out.

fans: still the same. hm

tweener: A-OK.

Orka_n
10-05-2010, 12:11 PM
What a failed poster and thread.Why bump this?

samanosuke
10-05-2010, 01:38 PM
and who are you ?

scarecrows
10-05-2010, 03:52 PM
the good old kappy

way better than current trolls

Jaz
10-05-2010, 04:13 PM
Idiot OP:

- Serve: The 1st serve is still very well good, and if executed correctly is devestating. The 1st serve has a tendency not to work in many key matches. Free-points on big points seem to be rare. 2nd serve, too predictable, has been eaten alive by some of the ball-basher like DelPo

- Return of Serve: Really needs more angles on this, the slice doesn't work against a lot of players now.

- Forehand: Consistent (it does not break down anymore). However, the accuracy has decline significantly. Seems to struggle in long rallies - Federer goes for POWER more than accuracy, and hence starts to leak errors when the point and match gets tight. He doesn't hit the lines any more.

Reasons 1: He's more content with spin rather than depth, and then when he goes for depth he overcooks it. The spin option gives the opponent too much time.
Reason 2: He no longer executes the down-the-line forehand often.
Reason 1+2: He can't control the points because his bread and butter is the make the opponent rush shots - this doesn't happen any more because of bad placement.

Backhand: Very good. Could do with down the line more often. But very reliable.

Volley: The half-volley is brilliant. However, normal volleys were a problem at the USO10

Lob: Good enough

Drop shots: Hasn't got back the FO09 form.

Stamina: Footwork gets slower and more weird as the match gets longer.

V.H.
10-05-2010, 05:25 PM
Not worthy

HKz
10-05-2010, 05:39 PM
Why bump this?

Would you rather have one more Rafatard thread be in its place?

Orka_n
10-05-2010, 08:16 PM
Would you rather have one more Rafatard thread be in its place?Firstly, the amount of Rafatard-threads has toned down lately with Tokyo and Beijing going on. Secondly, this is a stupid thread with an OP that seems suspicously Rafatardish. Why bump this again?

Sapeod
10-05-2010, 08:40 PM
We should unban Kapranos and Just Cause to see what crazy threads they create.

Snoo Foo
10-05-2010, 09:13 PM
federer forum

dombrfc
10-05-2010, 10:17 PM
- Lob: usually high.

:worship:

Ozone
10-05-2010, 10:30 PM
Troll alert. Quite comical OP

Myrre
10-06-2010, 09:51 AM
I'vr read some funny posts. This wasn't one of them.

JolánGagó
10-06-2010, 10:56 AM
- Serve: DECENT, but could be slighly more powerful. Usually well placed.

- Forehand. Not bad. Could cut the UE errors a bit!!!

- Backhand. Nice, but would be more effective with 2 hands.

- Volley: not flawless, but ok.

- Lob: usually high.

- drop shots, good. Not great. Good.

- Stamina: insuffisant.

- Charisma: inexistant.

- Luck: excessive in draws.

- Fans: not enough. Nadal more popular!!!

- Xristos: better than GeorgeWNazi!!!!!!!!

Word of genius if there is any :bowdown: :bowdown:

leng jai
10-06-2010, 11:11 AM
Legendary OP

HKz
10-06-2010, 07:08 PM
Firstly, the amount of Rafatard-threads has toned down lately with Tokyo and Beijing going on. Secondly, this is a stupid thread with an OP that seems suspicously Rafatardish. Why bump this again?

Well it clearly was somewhat comical to read for some people. Calm down, this is a public clown-for-all forum, so who cares, this is not some kind of formal corporate intraweb.