dmit424
06-11-2006, 02:17 PM
No, just kidding. But he's attacking more. That's the right thing to do against Roger.
Nadal figured Roger outdmit424 06-11-2006, 02:17 PM No, just kidding. But he's attacking more. That's the right thing to do against Roger. nsidhan 06-11-2006, 02:19 PM No he didn't. Roger lost that service because he was waaaay too casual. connectolove 06-11-2006, 02:19 PM As Nadal says, it is his responsibility to find solutions to beat Fed. He is a fighter and he´ll go to the extra mile. dmit424 06-11-2006, 02:21 PM Q. After the Rome final, Roger Federer said, "Now I guess I know how to beat him." What do you think? How can he do this probably? RAFAEL NADAL: I don't think nothing about that, no? Maybe he can beat me not now, after Rome. He can beat me in Monte‑Carlo, last year here, in Rome. Every time he can beat me. He is No. 1. I need find solution for beat him, not he find a solution for beat me, no? Lol, well said. connectolove 06-11-2006, 02:22 PM Rafa is sooooooo smart! nsidhan 06-11-2006, 02:22 PM Fed should just slice the backhand return and set himself up for his forehand instead of trying to match Rafa shot for shot. dmit424 06-11-2006, 02:24 PM Basically, if this is going to be 6-1, 1-6, that's just the last thing anyone could have expected. And now Federer is playing so bad even Hewitt could get a set. scarecrows 06-11-2006, 02:25 PM what a poor second set from Roger maybe they've agreed to let each other win 1 set and play a best of 3 match, you know, not to get too tired magnoliaewan 06-11-2006, 02:26 PM Good theory Scarecrows. ;) tripb19 06-11-2006, 02:26 PM What happened to 1st set Roger? He has gone missing. | |