This is what happens next at RG [Archive] - MensTennisForums.com

This is what happens next at RG

DDrago2
06-05-2006, 10:53 PM
Nalbandian defeats Davydenko and Federer defeats Ancic in QF

Federer loses to Nalbandian in SF

Nalbandian loses to Nadal in final

scoobs
06-05-2006, 11:02 PM
Thanks for that.

I won't bother tuning in now.

Do you have the Wimbledon winner as well? I could place a few bets.

ufokart
06-05-2006, 11:11 PM
Nalbandian defeats Davydenko and Federer defeats Ancic in QF

Federer loses to Nalbandian in SF

Nalbandian loses to Nadal in final

That's actually incorrect.
Nalbandian will lose to Benneteau in the final.

Yappa
06-05-2006, 11:16 PM
True about Benneteau, but he will win thx to 3 more walkovers. :devil:

George_Hanson
06-05-2006, 11:25 PM
Davydenko will lose to Benneteau in the final 1-6 2-6 7-6 2-6

DrJules
06-05-2006, 11:30 PM
Thanks for that.

I won't bother tuning in now.

Do you have the Wimbledon winner as well? I could place a few bets.

A good outside bet for Wimbledon is Lleyton Hewitt.

DrJules
06-05-2006, 11:38 PM
Nalbandian defeats Davydenko and Federer defeats Ancic in QF

Federer loses to Nalbandian in SF

Nalbandian loses to Nadal in final

I am beginning to think whoever reaches the final from the top half of the draw will win. Nadal must start to wear out at some point. :shrug:

Some figure on Eurosport implied that Nadal has run 33% further than Roger this event. Not sure how they measure it, but based on observation it seems he has run 2 or 3 times as far as Roger.

Things are looking good for Nalbandian as long as nobody tells him. :lol: :lol:

Leo
06-05-2006, 11:51 PM
Nalbandian defeats Davydenko and Federer defeats Ancic in QF

Federer loses to Nalbandian in SF

Nalbandian loses to Nadal in final

I think this is a very possible scenario. Nalbandian should not be overlooked and I don't believe Federer has ever beaten him in a best of 5 match on clay.

Argenbrit
06-06-2006, 12:03 AM
I think this is a very possible scenario. Nalbandian should not be overlooked and I don't believe Federer has ever beaten him in a best of 5 match on clay.

Yeah, they've never played a best of 5 match on clay before.

DDrago2
06-06-2006, 12:25 AM
You wonder how I came up with this predictions? All these revelations came to me from my SIXT SENSE. :eek:

And something tells me that it is Nadal who will win again this season. For Federer, it is not the time yet. It is not written.
But :eek: : if Federer reaches the final, he will defeat Nadal. Therefore: Federer must loose before the finals. And most possible - in SF against Nalbandian :eek:

My own wish for the winner, I am not going to say here. Then it may not come true.

DrJules: even if Nadal reaches the finals tired (which I doubt, he should have an easy job in next two matches), he would need to be taken in five sets marathon to realy feel it...

Scotso
06-06-2006, 12:33 AM
Nikolay is going to win the whole thing :D

Skyward
06-06-2006, 12:43 AM
Nikolay is going to win the whole thing



Can't you people keep your predictions to yourselves?

:lol:

Scotso
06-06-2006, 12:47 AM
I was being sarcastic in this thread. Clearly.

DDrago2
06-06-2006, 07:28 PM
You were sarcastic - now let's see what happens next...

Fumus
06-06-2006, 07:37 PM
Even if you are right, it's not like you are saying amazing long shots things that no one would think possible of coming true.

If at the begining of the tourny you told me Ivan would be in the RG qf, James blake would beat Almegro and Nadal would choke on a banana....I would :worship: you. lol

DDrago2
06-06-2006, 07:42 PM
It's still interesting to predict from quaterfinals to the end, that is the real phase of a Grand-Slam - the rest is always between a favourite and an underdog, or between the two non-contenders - not that interesting

Fumus
06-06-2006, 07:47 PM
It's still interesting to predict from quaterfinals to the end, that is the real phase of a Grand-Slam - the rest is always between a favourite and an underdog, or between the two non-contenders - not that interesting

Um yea but if it was Tommy Robredo in the semi-final, or someone else who has never beaten Roger...then I would be like that's a crazy prediction but...lol...it's not it's Nalbandian, Roger's old arch-nemisis we are talking about. Surely not a bold prediction.

tennischick
06-06-2006, 10:03 PM
i don't have the stomach for bold predictions!

jenanun
06-06-2006, 10:09 PM
I am beginning to think whoever reaches the final from the top half of the draw will win. Nadal must start to wear out at some point. :shrug:

Some figure on Eurosport implied that Nadal has run 33% further than Roger this event. Not sure how they measure it, but based on observation it seems he has run 2 or 3 times as far as Roger.

Things are looking good for Nalbandian as long as nobody tells him. :lol: :lol:

i was wondering....
if nadal has run 2 or 3 times as far as roger,
he would have run 200 to 300 % further than roger instead of 33%...
no?

and nadal will wear out at some point....

after winning RG.... :devil: