RonE
06-03-2006, 07:23 PM
Because he plays Hewitt. If you discount the 2006 Australian Open, in every single grand slam Hewitt has played in since and including the 2004 AO, the man who beat him went on to win the title.
;)
;)
Now I am convinced beyond doubt Rafa will win RG 2006RonE 06-03-2006, 07:23 PM Because he plays Hewitt. If you discount the 2006 Australian Open, in every single grand slam Hewitt has played in since and including the 2004 AO, the man who beat him went on to win the title. ;) DrJules 06-03-2006, 07:24 PM Because he plays Hewitt. If you discount the 2006 Australian Open, in every single grand slam Hewitt has played in since and including the 2004 AO, the man who beat him went on to win the title. ;) While there are players in the draw there is hope. :devil: robinhood 06-03-2006, 07:33 PM Because he plays Hewitt. If you discount the 2006 Australian Open, in every single grand slam Hewitt has played in since and including the 2004 AO, the man who beat him went on to win the title. ;) That's right. Another ominous sign. Kiefer is already out of the tournament which means Fed doesn't get to beat him in four sets. No Kiefer-four-setter, no slam for Fed. (Unless Fed gets to play Hewitt in the final. :D ) star 06-03-2006, 07:41 PM :haha: Desperate attempt at a jinxing thread. I♥PsY@Mus!c 06-03-2006, 07:41 PM Of course I want Hewitt to beat him,but on this surface and his form it's not easy to challenge Nadal.Let's see what happen,today even the "hopeless" Paulo just was fighting so hard,I expect the better mental state Hewitt can show more.Also Nadal is exhausted, (The guy choked on banana this time,what will he do next? ) Allez Hewitt! :fiery: LLeytonRules 06-03-2006, 07:44 PM Next time Nadal will say, i have a fly stuck up my butt. :o Black Adam 06-03-2006, 07:45 PM Rone and Oneandonlyhsn's jinxing attempts will only give nadal more luck;) Ceri 06-03-2006, 07:46 PM Come on Lleyton! maria87 06-03-2006, 09:00 PM the only problem i found is that Hewitt beat Nadal in AO 2005, last time the played...He witt is 3-0 over Nadal...maybe because they have similar defensive game? 5 7 6 3 6 1 6 7 2 6 could him beat Nadal on clay? Billabong 06-03-2006, 09:02 PM Well, it's like saying: I am convinced that Hewitt will win, because everytime he had to face Nadal in a tournament, he beat him;) So you have both jinxes;) keqtqiadv 06-03-2006, 09:07 PM the only problem i found is that Hewitt beat Nadal in AO 2005, last time the played...He witt is 3-0 over Nadal...maybe because they have similar defensive game? 5 7 6 3 6 1 6 7 2 6 could him beat Nadal on clay? The record was made before Rafa reaches his top form. Until Brasil Open 2005, it wasn't that difficult to beat him. Gulliver 06-03-2006, 11:03 PM Because he plays Hewitt. If you discount the 2006 Australian Open, in every single grand slam Hewitt has played in since and including the 2004 AO, the man who beat him went on to win the title. ;) Interesting. But if Hewitt beats Nadal, we will have to wait and see who then beats Hewitt :) | |