Pete Rose [Archive] - MensTennisForums.com

Pete Rose

Tennis Fool
01-06-2004, 11:43 PM
After being banned for life from baseball Pete Rose, in his new book, finally admits to gambling on games.

Should he now be allowed into the Hall of Fame or not?

andylover_16
01-07-2004, 12:11 AM
After being banned for life from baseball Pete Rose, in his new book, finally admits to gambling on games.

Should he now be allowed into the Hall of Fame or not?


he was a great player right?..who had problems with gambling..doesnt that run along the line of seperating your personal life from your career as a player..i dont know..is it any different than if you cheated on your wife?

MisterQ
01-07-2004, 12:34 AM
he was a great player right?..who had problems with gambling..doesnt that run along the line of seperating your personal life from your career as a player..i dont know..is it any different than if you cheated on your wife?

yes, because cheating on your wife doesn't go against the rules of your sport. whereas gambling on baseball is prohibited if you are involved in the baseball team.

I haven't made up my mind on this one (even though there has been plenty of time, lol!) His great accomplishments are still great accomplishments, even with the gambling issue taken into consideration. On the other hand, surely there should be a standard of conduct for professionals in any field...

It will be up to the people in the Hall of Fame to decide. It's as much about their standards as it is about Pete Rose.

andylover_16
01-07-2004, 01:15 AM
yes, because cheating on your wife doesn't go against the rules of your sport. whereas gambling on baseball is prohibited if you are involved in the baseball team.

I haven't made up my mind on this one (even though there has been plenty of time, lol!) His great accomplishments are still great accomplishments, even with the gambling issue taken into consideration. On the other hand, surely there should be a standard of conduct for professionals in any field...

It will be up to the people in the Hall of Fame to decide. It's as much about their standards as it is about Pete Rose.


oh, i see...i didnt catch the part about him betting on baseball..i was understood just general betting...like gambling or something

Leo
01-07-2004, 01:59 AM
No, he should not be. How can anyone who sabotages the sport in that way ever become a Hall of Famer?

Tennis Fool
01-08-2004, 12:22 AM
He has the most base hits of all time, even though he bet on 500+ games, that would be like denying Pete Sampras entrance in the Tennis Hall of Fame.

Leo
01-08-2004, 12:41 AM
Well Pete Sampras didn't bet on tennis.

Tennis Fool
01-08-2004, 12:54 AM
A certain other player, Y**ahem*, has been accused and he's a shoe in for the HOF.

star
01-08-2004, 01:32 AM
I don't know if he is a shoo in for the HOF.

Nevertheless, baseball has had a stern rule on betting and people have lost their careers over it. Not only did Pete Rose bet on baseball, he did so over a very long period, and then he lied to the public for ... what? 20 years? about it. He claimed he was framed, done wrong, a victim. There was no end to his whining. Now he admits what any sane person knew all along, and he's supposed to be rewarded for that?

Nope.......... The hall of shame is where he belongs.

Leo
01-08-2004, 04:34 AM
A certain other player, Y**ahem*, has been accused and he's a shoe in for the HOF.

Accusations are meaningless without proof. In Pete Rose's case, there's not a single doubt that he committed a serious crime.

Tingu
01-08-2004, 05:41 AM
yeh i no

Bethly
01-08-2004, 08:09 AM
Since he gambled when he was a Manager and not a player, I think he should still be allowed to enter the HOF as a player. As the all time hits leader he should be in the Hall of Fame.