Pete Grand Slam lost Finals - in Perpective - Part I - Safin 2000 [Archive] - MensTennisForums.com

Pete Grand Slam lost Finals - in Perpective - Part I - Safin 2000

Hank777
03-28-2006, 09:51 PM
Here I'd like to open a somewhat sad, yet interesting topic series, to dig deeper into the "why's" and "how's" of Pete losing in a GRAND SLAM final.

Part I - 2000 US open - def. by Marat Safin

I'll just start at random, giving my personal impressions / reasons for the Pete being defeated:

- I thought Safin was simply playing the better match of the 2, it wasn't as much Pete playing bad as it was Safin playing (very) good

The one thought that lingers with me though is : tactics

Pete said I tried chip n charge, (no effect), serve&volley (no effect), baseline (... no effect)

Yet I have to disagree a tad, I though Pete should have stayed back more on his serve, with Marat returning the way he did.

In the final game, finally Pete started staying back more, and regardles of winning the point(s) it seemed to me that he should have stuck to that. He did it against Agassi in 2001 the next year ...

COMMENTS people, I'm interested in hearing your views !! :cool:

angiel
03-28-2006, 10:28 PM
Here I'd like to open a somewhat sad, yet interesting topic series, to dig deeper into the "why's" and "how's" of Pete losing in a GRAND SLAM final.

Part I - 2000 US open - def. by Marat Safin

I'll just start at random, giving my personal impressions / reasons for the Pete being defeated:

- I thought Safin was simply playing the better match of the 2, it wasn't as much Pete playing bad as it was Safin playing (very) good

The one thought that lingers with me though is : tactics

Pete said I tried chip n charge, (no effect), serve&volley (no effect), baseline (... no effect)

Yet I have to disagree a tad, I though Pete should have stayed back more on his serve, with Marat returning the way he did.

In the final game, finally Pete started staying back more, and regardles of winning the point(s) it seemed to me that he should have stuck to that. He did it against Agassi in 2001 the next year ...

COMMENTS people, I'm interested in hearing your views !! :cool:


Suppose I was to say the the match the day before takes all out of him, for the final :rolleyes: :D but you are right Safin did play a great match, only a pity, because look where he is today, not making any use of his talent or his sport, a shame. :sad: :mad: :wavey:

Mimi
03-29-2006, 02:07 AM
again pete fans have the last laugh coz he won 14 slams, while safin only has 2 slams and he is 26 already :devil: :p

Hank777
03-29-2006, 09:45 AM
again pete fans have the last laugh coz he won 14 slams, while safin only has 2 slams and he is 26 already
Well, I am not laughin at Safin, he's talented, perhaps it's a shame he hasn't done more with his talent, 2 slams for a player of his caliber, it's odd in a way.

Back to topic though, anybody here have more thoughts on the reasons for this loss ? Keep it comin' :)

MariaV
03-29-2006, 10:06 AM
It was a totally SURREAL match IMO. Marat played out of this world and that's the main reason IMO. Staying back more .... I don't it would've made the difference really. It was just one of those days where Marat couldn't do anything wrong.
:wavey:

ragson_83
03-29-2006, 12:18 PM
It was a totally SURREAL match IMO. Marat played out of this world and that's the main reason IMO. Staying back more .... I don't it would've made the difference really. It was just one of those days where Marat couldn't do anything wrong.
:wavey:

I agree.. The only man capable of beating Safin at that moment was Pete with 1999Wimbledon Form(when he thrashed Agassi) or 1996 Masters when he beat becker.. :angel: :angel:
poor pete failed to keep the form he showed till he reached there...
:wavey: :wavey:

angiel
03-29-2006, 10:19 PM
I agree.. The only man capable of beating Safin at that moment was Pete with 1999Wimbledon Form(when he thrashed Agassi) or 1996 Masters when he beat becker.. :angel: :angel:
poor pete failed to keep the form he showed till he reached there...
:wavey: :wavey:


Poor Pete you say :rolleyes: :rolleyes: but look who has the last laugh, pete did, because he beat Safin the next year, then lose to Hewitt in the final. :worship: :p :wavey:

the_natural
03-30-2006, 09:58 AM
Well Pete didnt know Safin well enough to realise that he SHOULD have tried to play as aggressively as possible to mess with safins rhythmn as he did in 01, and in 01 Safin wasnt IN THE ZONE like he was in 00 BUUUUUT He was playing "The best tennis since USO 2000" and that was Macs opinion during the Quarters match between pete and andre. If Pete was still the young confident guy he used to be, he would have thought more during the 00 final and learnt to get inside Marats head. But Im not sayin he woulda have won easily though, he woulda had to work hard even if he did get the successful formula cos as U guys said he was just in the zone

almouchie
03-31-2006, 10:22 AM
should the 1992 US open loss to Stefan Edberg be the first part
the loss had a profounf effect on Pete's career.

Sampras was tired in the final with Safin, who had probably played the best match of his life, better than AO semifinal last year against Federer
Everything Marat was doing was right, he could do no wrong. It was just meant to be

the_natural
04-01-2006, 10:53 AM
AND HE WAS YOUNG!!! AND no Injuries back then, I think that was the absolute pinnacle of his powers.

angiel
04-01-2006, 06:38 PM
AND HE WAS YOUNG!!! AND no Injuries back then, I think that was the absolute pinnacle of his powers.


he is still young ;) :p :cool: :wavey: